6/49 Discussion For March 06, 2004

[peter]

I'm going to say we will see a high starting draw. Really don't see anything much under 10 for Saturday.

Well as we know $10 million dollar draws could be a candidate for at least one missed decade.
I suspect it could be the first decade, draw starts with a low double digit.

 

[Sheba]

The Lottery People would Love for this not to go ...
They want to make some......

Sheba__ ~~~
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

[Sheba]

Sheba:

Ok, you got it, the best luck with those!

Regards,
George

Thanks George...
But I still have to get an insta pik just in case...


Sheba__ ~~~
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

[mon]

OK BASED ON THE QUICK PICKS I GOT , THERE ARE ALOT OF HITS FOR 27 AND 31 FOLLOWED BY 29
NOT MANY HITS CAME OUT IN THE FORTIES.

 

[mon]

I LIKE EITHER 19 OR 21 FOR NEXT DRAW

 

[mon]

LOOKING ALSO AT THE 45 OR 48 ..... REALLY ALL THE FORTIES LOOK GOOD SOME HAVE BEEN COLD FOR AWHILE AND SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT TO THAW

 

[mon]

BUT LIKE BEAKER AND A FEW OTHERS ON THIS BOARD I LIKE SEEING SUPER 7 DRAWS BEFORE MAKING MY FINAL CUT.

 

[Beaker]

Well as we know $10 million dollar draws could be a candidate for at least one missed decade.
I suspect it could be the first decade, draw starts with a low double digit.

Peter, as you know, we have had many good announcers for our high draw - not to mention the $10million draws are often high.

What me a bit is that 4-5 open pair - we may see one or both of those but I'm leaning toward that 5 also something from 1-2 could spoil here.


Lots of good low candidates to consider

 

[colonel4]

My selections are:
7,8,9,10,11,12,16,20,21,31,34,35,37,49

I cut out these numbers:
6,13,22,30,32,33,36,47

Hope I was right

 

[peter]

My selections are:
7,8,9,10,11,12,16,20,21,31,34,35,37,49
Hope I was right

You have a few in that list Colonel4, that I really like. namely, 11, 12, 37.

 

[peter]

Peter, as you know, we have had many good announcers for our high draw - not to mention the $10million draws are often high.

What me a bit is that 4-5 open pair - we may see one or both of those but I'm leaning toward that 5 also something from 1-2 could spoil here.


Lots of good low candidates to consider

I don't see any in the first decade Beaker, not after seeing 3 single digits in a row.

 

[luckystrike]

10 MILL DRAW....

HAVE TO HAVE THIS ONE IN YOUR FINAL SETS!!!!




...10...

 

[peter]

OK BASED ON THE QUICK PICKS I GOT , THERE ARE ALOT OF HITS FOR 27 AND 31 FOLLOWED BY 29
NOT MANY HITS CAME OUT IN THE FORTIES.

If I have those many on a QP, better believe, they will be good filters.

 

[luckystrike]

OK BASED ON THE QUICK PICKS I GOT , THERE ARE ALOT OF HITS FOR 27 AND 31 FOLLOWED BY 29
NOT MANY HITS CAME OUT IN THE FORTIES.

...31...

 

[peter]

Re: 10 MILL DRAW....

HAVE TO HAVE THIS ONE IN YOUR FINAL SETS!!!!



...10...

Close Bruce!, so very close.
Nice to see you again, we missed you!Welcome back!

 

[luckystrike]

GLAD TO BE BACK BUDDY!!!

 

[peter]

7 is a great repeater

I'll take the 43 to repeat, instead,thank-you.

 

[peter]

43...

Sheba__ ~~~
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Sheba, you have chosen wisely!

 

[luckystrike]

HEADING OUT FOR DINNER...BUT I'LL BE BACK LATER TO-NIGHT....

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

I'd say 07 if there was a single digit hit... ...either 07 or none from decade 00... ...we know 07 is good repeater... ...I'd expect 49 to follow 01 as we have seen before.

Beaker feels a tsunami influence is a factor.

Regards,
George

I don't see any in the first decade Beaker, not after seeing 3 single digits in a row.