Dennis Bassboss
Member
I will double that nice to see you niteowlBeaker said:Nice to see you niteowl - hope everything is well
Nice picks for this one - we have 6 in common
!! How is it in your up north country ?
6/49 Discussion For July 12, 2003
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
!! How is it in your up north country ?
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Re: Good to be back
Good ...I'm looking forward for your picks...especially for Super 7....With your presence we will just get better there!niteowl said:
Dennis Bassboss
Member
From tonites winner take a look at this...3 sets coming from the most 5 hitters in history....(5 numbers sets)
03-04-08-28-31
21-29-32-38-47
13-16-21-26-35
Perhaps I should play the total 8 top performing sets in the future....
03-04-08-28-31
21-29-32-38-47
13-16-21-26-35
Perhaps I should play the total 8 top performing sets in the future....
Beaker
Member
Might watch that for the future.Dennis Bassboss said:From tonites winner take a look at this...3 sets coming from the most 5 hitters in history....(5 numbers sets)
03-04-08-28-31
21-29-32-38-47
13-16-21-26-35
Perhaps I should play the total 8 top performing sets in the future....
Look what is left to play:
16-26-28-31-32-38-47
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Well here they are...Beaker said:Might watch that for the future.
Look what is left to play:
16-26-28-31-32-38-47
02-12-40-42-45
03-04-08-28-31
05-10-35-36-45
09-11-21-28-37
09-11-28-29-37
12-19-22-35-47
13-16-21-26-35
21-29-32-38-47
I'm going to watch them more in the future for sure...
Dennis Bassboss
Member
If you look at the discussion I think that Maggie spotted 2 from 5 in one post....now join that with her 35 from last week that Luckystrike mentionned somewhere in the discussion and that makes it 3 out of 6....It was close when you think about it... 
Beaker
Member
Yeah, and I think MAggie was eyeing that 35 last time. That was a good callDennis Bassboss said:If you look at the discussion I think that Maggie spotted 2 from 5 in one post....now join that with her 35 from last week that Luckystrike mentionned somewhere in the discussion and that makes it 3 out of 6....It was close when you think about it...
19 draws out.I wouldn't have played that one
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Same thing with 16... But when 04-13 are in the spotlight for two consecutives draws....everything goes overboard...Beaker said:Yeah, and I think MAggie was eyeing that 35 last time. That was a good call
I wouldn't have played that one
Beaker
Member
This little gem may be very very valuable.peter said:Here are the draws that the 13 occurred in the 4th position.
4,75,387,451,807,864,1024,1266,1366,1498,1579,1624
Look back at the draws immediately following these, there is a clue there, but you must work for the goodies.
I think we should look at the announcers for these. This is positional announcers - I believe we have talked about this before - but there could have some real quality gems hidden here.
4 7 13 31 36 37 28 1625 no 40's
5 24 30 33 37 40 31 1580
2 27 32 35 41 47 4 1499
5 6 21 26 42 48 28 1367
3 8 13 21 32 49 28 1267
8 28 30 33 37 46 24 1025
14 17 21 25 27 39 32 865 no 40's
12 25 36 37 40 42 19 808 - nothing here BUT
13 21 27 46 47 48 15 809
Positional Announcers - Needs investigation.
Dennis Bassboss
Member
When an announcers history is loaded into my program here....I can produce it for every number ...Not so long ago I posted an announcing positionnal grid...But I was aiming at the numbers themselves and not at decades missing ....Interesting Beaker we have to investigate it more...Beaker said:This little gem may be very very valuable.
I think we should look at the announcers for these. This is positional announcers - I believe we have talked about this before - but there could have some real quality gems hidden here.
4 7 13 31 36 37 28 1625 no 40's
5 24 30 33 37 40 31 1580
2 27 32 35 41 47 4 1499
5 6 21 26 42 48 28 1367
3 8 13 21 32 49 28 1267
8 28 30 33 37 46 24 1025
14 17 21 25 27 39 32 865 no 40's
12 25 36 37 40 42 19 808 - nothing here BUT
13 21 27 46 47 48 15 809
Positional Announcers - Needs investigation.
Beaker
Member
Yes. I knew you did this in some form but that grid is overall if I am not mistaken.Dennis Bassboss said:When an announcers history is loaded into my program here....I can produce it for every number ...Not so long ago I posted an announcing positionnal grid...But I was aiming at the numbers themselves and not at decades missing ....Interesting Beaker we have to investigate it more...
If you get some odd-ball number, like 13 in the 4th position, this could tell you alot of things looking back on the history.
I think we should look at say last 5 draws, or whatever draws back, and look at positional announcers and the characteristics of these draws.
I would have to re-write my code for positional work but might be worth a look.
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I'll set it up for next draw...
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I can post it for any draws back in time you name it 5 ...12....21...etc...Beaker said:Yes. I knew you did this in some form but that grid is overall if I am not mistaken.
If you get some odd-ball number, like 13 in the 4th position, this could tell you alot of things looking back on the history.
I think we should look at say last 5 draws, or whatever draws back, and look at positional announcers and the characteristics of these draws.
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Examples (using the regular history excluding tonite's draw)for ball 13
last 30 draws...
1 time in position 2 (2014)
1 time in position 4 (2031)
last 532 draws
11 times in position 1 (1936)
23 times in position 2 (2014)
19 times in position 3 (1971)
7 times in position 4 (2031)
2 times in position 5 (1871)
last 30 draws...
1 time in position 2 (2014)
1 time in position 4 (2031)
last 532 draws
11 times in position 1 (1936)
23 times in position 2 (2014)
19 times in position 3 (1971)
7 times in position 4 (2031)
2 times in position 5 (1871)
Beaker:
You're most very welcome buddy. I've been posting that report and then lurking to a degree. There are some things which have taken my time away from being more active on the forum. I'm here but not here, if you know what I mean.
Regards,
George
You're most very welcome
buddy. I've been posting that report and then lurking to a degree. There are some things which have taken my time away from being more active on the forum. I'm here but not here, if you know what I mean.Regards,
George
Beaker said:Again George's 30/19 hit 4+B/2. Very effective guide there
Thanks for that post George
Posistion
Dennis:
Of course, you know and watch position for each number like most of us players on the forum. Something like 44 in the first position is never in the game (if it happens, next draw please). The odds are way too high. For those who wait for 01 02 03 405 06 or 44 45 46 47 48 49 to be drawn are going to wait a very long time. No need to go further with this, case closed.
Position for all regular numbers were within the boundaries of my specifications this time (the last draw, was not the case I'm afraid the way I view this issue). I think using all the history works well for this too.
Regards,
George
PS: Delta Pairings worked for us again too.
Dennis:
Of course, you know and watch position for each number like most of us players on the forum. Something like 44 in the first position is never in the game (if it happens, next draw please). The odds are way too high. For those who wait for 01 02 03 405 06 or 44 45 46 47 48 49 to be drawn are going to wait a very long time. No need to go further with this, case closed.
Position for all regular numbers were within the boundaries of my specifications this time (the last draw, was not the case
I'm afraid the way I view this issue). I think using all the history works well for this too.Regards,
George
PS: Delta Pairings worked for us again too
.Dennis Bassboss said: