6/49 Discussion For January 22, 2005

[mirage]

(Originally posted by Pradeep)

Theses are Fibonaci numbers.
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597


do you find any similarities with 649 results.?

Pradeep,

Good luck with your thoughts but it's too arcane for me to see any "aha" events.

As for me, I finally reinstalled GH after sorting out whatever glitch came with it, with the first download that is, 10 weeks ago, just before my life fell apart around that same time period. And so now finally able to update the draw histories with just one or two keystrokes from the site. (Whew!) Ok, Now we're in business. My whole view of reality is changed.

Looking back, the current trends have been entrenched for a while. We are at a point where the trends, like weather, will either stick around for a little bit longer or change.

34 again is possible but others which are hot are 1, 42 and 21.
21 would be doing a 4-in-a-row-peat only if you consider the bonus number.

Also, what's with this logic? Since when do repeats go:
a repeat, a 3-peat, a 4-peat, etc?

 

[Carlito]

This GW software Is it free and does it work? Also What is probably the best lotto softeware out there?

 

[Beaker]

This GW software Is it free and does it work? Also What is probably the best lotto softeware out there?

Good question - take it to the 'Software' thread

For all those that have a problem with the logic of 3peat 4peat I'm going to change the name to 3-hitter 4-hitter 5-hitter

So, 21-34 are 4-hitter candidates to be considered

 

[Karnac]

(Originally posted by Pradeep)

Theses are Fibonaci numbers.
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597


do you find any similarities with 649 results.?

Pradeep,

Good luck with your thoughts but it's too arcane for me to see any "aha" events.

As for me, I finally reinstalled GH after sorting out whatever glitch came with it, with the first download that is, 10 weeks ago, just before my life fell apart around that same time period. And so now finally able to update the draw histories with just one or two keystrokes from the site. (Whew!) Ok, Now we're in business. My whole view of reality is changed.

Looking back, the current trends have been entrenched for a while. We are at a point where the trends, like weather, will either stick around for a little bit longer or change.

34 again is possible but others which are hot are 1, 42 and 21.
21 would be doing a 4-in-a-row-peat only if you consider the bonus number.

Also, what's with this logic? Since when does do repeats go:
a repeat, a 3-peat, a 4-peat, etc?

Good to see you've touched up your roots Mirage

 

[mirage]

Karnac,

Well, it's in process. My nasal passages are clogged with hair dye product (ammonia) smell right now... (Took care of that typo -
"does do" in original post.)

 

[peter]

Good question - take it to the 'Software' thread

For all those that have a problem with the logic of 3peat 4peat I'm going to change the name to 3-hitter 4-hitter 5-hitter

So, 21-34 are 4-hitter candidates to be considered

We could coin a new abbreviation, and refer to them as
CDH=Consecutive,Draw,Hits.Applying this logic, the 34 has the potential of becoming a 4 CDH.

 

[peter]

Since this can of worms was started by George, I ask the age old question....Which came first... the can, or the worms.

 

[peter]

All jokes aside, in my mind a 4peat, will always be a number that has come 4 times in a row, it does'nt matter what name you give it, as long as you understand what it is.
You could call a hammer, a merham, but as long as you understand a merham to be a hammer The name or designation is immaterial.

 

[Karnac]

What about a double, triple or quad hitter.....or is the can getting bigger

 

[peter]

Does a quad hitter, make it a dynasty?

 

[Beaker]

What about a double, triple or quad hitter.....or is the can getting bigger

Worms are everywhere

YOU will have to clean them up

Play them to win - not the worms - the quad-hitters to be

 

[Beaker]

Birdy gave me a little hint

30

 

[Karnac]

Birdy gave me a little hint

30

# 5 in the top 5 announced.

 

[peter]

That 9,13,15 from last nights Super 7 looks very interesting, I think I'll investigate it further.

 

[Sheba]

That 9,13,15 from last nights Super 7 looks very interesting, I think I'll investigate it further.

Peter, the Private Eyer who always get the numbers... but changes them often..


Sheba..

 

[Beaker]

That 9,13,15 from last nights Super 7 looks very interesting, I think I'll investigate it further.

13-15-40

 

[peter]

Beaker, I think I'm sold on that 30, particularily with that 9,13,15, we talked about, not so sure on that 40 however.
And when I think of 9,13,15, I just gotta throw in the 7.

 

[peter]

For all of you buying into this 4peat for the 34, if you have followed my theory on same last digit draws, and my hundreds theory... the 34 is out exactly 200 draws... last coming in a draw that ends in a two, in draw 1992.

 

[Karnac]

I like that 7 peter...very strong indications

 

[Beaker]

Just updated some data here.

Might see 3 from the same unit sum - for those that remember what unit sum is.

Do a search.