6/49 Discussion For January 12, 2005

peter

Member
Go back and check out draws that had a triple consecutive, triple consecutives seem to cluster.
My monies on a triple consecutive in the first decade, plus it ties in with the assumption, that most of the play will come from the last 4 draws.
 

peter

Member
We have'nt had a sum total under a hundred since 1917, it's about due.:agree:
The 1/2 was in play in that one too!:eek:
 

Beaker

Member
peter said:
You forgot to mention 2175, as well.
I like that 30

Peter, looking at your 10's list I see that 10 alot 10-12/10-14/10-18/10-16

could be DN :agree:

This 10-11-13-16-19 has a few gems in it ;)
 

peter

Member
I do however like the 1,2,11 from draw 1979.
I quess I may travel that road least travelled, for this one.
 

Karnac

Member
Top 5 numbers following 3 15 18 19 32 48 17 are 47 27 43 31 45. Funny how that 47 and 43 found their way here.
 

Beaker

Member
Karnac said:
Top 5 numbers following 3 15 18 19 32 48 17 are 47 27 43 31 45. Funny how that 47 and 43 found their way here.
I'm playing them maybe with 42-49

Don't forget our 1-49 combo - 1 hit a few draws back 49 is on deck

Damn 48 :burnt: Very tricky number - could repeat
 

peter

Member
I'm sticking with the oridginal plan of taking numbers mostly from the last 4 draws, when I draw a line down the center of the page that lists all the draws, the bulk of the open numbers are on the left side of the page, again indicating numbers from the lower half of the decades.
 

peter

Member
peter said:
Sheba's best bet of 3 is very interesting.
It will be out exactly 100 draws, in draws ending in a 9, last coming in draw 2089, also it repeated in 2089 from 2088.:agree:
 

peter

Member
If you look at my picks, I've selected 5 numbers that have come within the last 4 draws, also alot of primes.:agree:
Can't go wrong with primes.:agree:
 

Sidebar

Top