6/49 Discussion For February 14, 2004

Dennis Bassboss said:
The 29-35 range that Both I and Snides pointed out was blank yesterday...so we should see an explosion soon...
When I see 04-14... I know where to look for double announcers folks....
Watch out for the high draws floodgate here....When it will start the lotto world will rumble... :agree:
And some Hanging ghost posted in the last discussions thread will jump all over... Starting to watch that dancing set again....

:lol:
 
Originally posted by Dennis Bassboss in the discussions thread for February 11...
If I go back a little more like the last 20 draws...That list grows up to nine triples that have hit twice...
01-05-07
02-13-42
03-27-35
05-17-44
13-14-17
14-20-23

If you like the 13...got to consider some of the partners that came up with 13 in the last 20 draws...Now if 44 repeats look who's there!!! Our friend the 05...
:eek:
 
Dennis Bassboss in the discussions thread for February the 11 said:
Now the best pair in the last 20 draws is the
01-07 It has hit 4 times...
All of these pairs have hit 3 times in the last 20 draws...
05-44
14-17
14-25
20-23
And all are good candidates to hit hard in the next...All of them...Got to consider it...
:agree: :eek: :agree2: :clown: :agree2:
 
Dennis Bassboss in the discussions thread for February 11 said:
Number 20 came up 3 times in the last 10 draws and number 43 came up 2 times in the last 10 draws but they have not come together yet... :no:
But They are both hanging ghost now....
Hanging ghost list....05-15-20-29-36-39-43 :eek:
 

hot4

Member
Re: 7 * 4 numbers updated

hot4 said:

03-13-14-37 (0)
04-19-30-39 (0)
05-11-20-23 (1)
06-09-21-27 (0)
07-34-44-47 (1)
08-28-31-46 (1)
10-29-35-42 (0)


I'll wheel 5 from these 28 numbers (max=2 min=0 from each row).

Only 3 numbers in 28. However the wheel with 5 of them, hit 3 twice!

What will happen when 5 numbers hit?

George your set of 30 numbers hit 5!! :agree: :agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Re: 7 * 4 numbers updated

Frank:

This way to make sets works, no doubt about it... ...all you are doing is betting a row will not be filled with hits... ...if you add another row, hitting numbers to use will be more abundant most of the time... ...make a long list of rows and a short one... ...if the short one has 5 or even 6, it could be awesome.

Because of only 3 hits in those 28 numbers the chance of 2 or all three on a line is low (it could happen and wreck your day).

For my list of 30, 5 hitters is too many numbers to effectively nail something if you played no more than 4 from there... ...I mananged an accidental 3 hitter.

Regards,
George:)
hot4 said:
Only 3 numbers in 28. However the wheel with 5 of them, hit 3 twice!

What will happen when 5 numbers hit?

George your set of 30 numbers hit 5!! :agree: :agree2:
 

hot4

Member
Re: Re: Re: 7 * 4 numbers updated

gsobier said:
Frank:

This way to make sets works, no doubt about it... ...all you are doing is betting a row will not be filled with hits... ...if you add another row, hitting numbers to use will be more abundant most of the time... ...make a long list of rows and a short one... ...if the short one has 5 or even 6, it could be awesome.

That's what I'm expecting some draws ago. Expected for 5of28 is +- 6-7 draws. I want to see what will happen when 5 or 6 numbers hit in this kind of strategy. I didn't understand what you meant by *making a long list of rows and a short one...* , could you explain your idea please?


Because of only 3 hits in those 28 numbers the chance of 2 or all three on a line is low (it could happen and wreck your day).

For my list of 30, 5 hitters is too many numbers to effectively nail something if you played no more than 4 from there... ...I mananged an accidental 3 hitter.

Regards,
George:)

Perhaps you may not want to tell us that your 30 numbers group, hits better than expected, but I'd like to see the rate between observed and expected following each amount of hits respecting each figure (5-1, 6-0, ...).

As I know you have this report automated, it would be easy for you (only once). Of course if you agree ...:wavey:
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Re: Re: Re: 7 * 4 numbers updated

Frank:

A long list and short list idea is simply 6 rows of 4 and also an 8 rows of 4 setup... ...if 5 or 6 hits are in the 6 rows of 4 then you have a great chance if things fall just right in the rows of 4.

You might get more numbers hitting in 8 rows instead of 7 but there is the issue of too many numbers... ...it depends on what you are comfortable with and how you do things.

This draw of 7 rows of 4 with had just 3 hits in there which locked you of out of better prizes right away. Its a tough call at times.

Regards,
George:)
hot4 said:
That's what I'm expecting some draws ago. Expected for 5of28 is +- 6-7 draws. I want to see what will happen when 5 or 6 numbers hit in this kind of strategy. I didn't understand what you meant by *making a long list of rows and a short one...* , could you explain your idea please?



Perhaps you may not want to tell us that your 30 numbers group, hits better than expected, but I'd like to see the rate between observed and expected following each amount of hits respecting each figure (5-1, 6-0, ...).

As I know you have this report automated, it would be easy for you (only once). Of course if you agree ...:wavey:
 

Sidebar

Top