Re: Re: Re: 7 * 4 numbers updated
gsobier said:
Frank:
This way to make sets works, no doubt about it... ...all you are doing is betting a row will not be filled with hits... ...if you add another row, hitting numbers to use will be more abundant most of the time... ...make a long list of rows and a short one... ...if the short one has 5 or even 6, it could be awesome.
That's what I'm expecting some draws ago. Expected for 5of28 is +- 6-7 draws. I want to see what will happen when 5 or 6 numbers hit in this kind of strategy. I didn't understand what you meant by *making a long list of rows and a short one...* , could you explain your idea please?
Because of only 3 hits in those 28 numbers the chance of 2 or all three on a line is low (it could happen and wreck your day).
For my list of 30, 5 hitters is too many numbers to effectively nail something if you played no more than 4 from there... ...I mananged an accidental 3 hitter.
Regards,
George
Perhaps you may not want to tell us that your 30 numbers group, hits better than expected, but I'd like to see the rate between observed and expected following each amount of hits respecting each figure (5-1, 6-0, ...).
As I know you have this report automated, it would be easy for you (only once). Of course if you agree ...