6/49 Discussion For December 17, 2003

[peter]

That 20 is a gutsy call If it hits you'll be a genius

As I said before, something from 20-21-22

I can't see it happening (20) as for the other two, 21,22 I can't see it either, sorry just not in my playing field.

 

[peter]

I said many discussions ago... watch that 2-4 punch...

 

[peter]

Predicted no hit set

02 09 10 14 17 21 24 28 40 42 44 45 48

As usual, one or two of these numbers from the set above definitely will slip through. I wish I knew which ones. The rest are no-go.

the 2,9,10.

 

[peter]

Remember this?

And this one
>5 9 11 12 25 34 39 40 47

these are good

9,34,39.

 

[peter]

04-19 is a very cold pair....

nice pair.

 

[peter]

20 is way due here! Was this the longest time it went before hitting? 31 times?

Sheba__ ~~~
--------------------------------------------------------

still waayyyyy to cold

 

[peter]

I wonder what number I'll have in mind for the next

PLAY THE 39

 

[peter]

See that 4 coming up in those announcer draws [/B]

wise choice,

 

[Beaker]

I can't see it happening (20) as for the other two, 21,22 I can't see it either, sorry just not in my playing field.

Well if you're NOT PLAYING 6/49 maybe, but, if you are you need one of them

 

[peter]

It's time for the prime set.

 

[peter]

Well if you're NOT PLAYING 6/49 maybe, but, if you are you need one of them

Actually Beaker, I'll be playing lotto 6/29, and I still don't need one of them.

 

[peter]

Only 27 draws with a sum total under 100, could this be number 28 ?

 

[peter]

Every century except for 3 have had one, none so far this century.

 

[Beaker]

It's time for the prime set.

Could see 3 of them and that 3 will be the start.

Expect you are playing the combo5 with all those Best Bets

 

[peter]

Last time we had decades 4 and 5 miss together was draw 1966, check those numbers out.
works for my hundreds/tens theory, plus or minus one.

 

[peter]

Could see 3 of them and that 3 will be the start.

Expect you are playing the combo5 with all those Best Bets

You got it!!! 5 DN's.

 

[Beaker]

Last time we had decades 4 and 5 miss together was draw 1966, check those numbers out.
works for my hundreds/tens theory, plus or minus one.

Check again - 1993/2069 - regular numbers

Just looking at my decade announcer stat - you may be right - one or both of those decades may miss

 

[peter]

Check again - 1993/2069 - regular numbers

JUst looking at my decade announcer stat - you may be right - one or both of those decades may miss

You are correct Beaker, Regular numbers only, however I included the bonus number in my statement.

 

[Beaker]

You are correct Beaker, Regular numbers only, however I included the bonus number in my statement.

Yes, I see that now.

Best decade miss candidates:

10's
30's
30's+40's

could see all decades here also.

 

[Maggie]

I can't see the 40's missing this next draw.