6/49 Discussion For December 04, 2004

G

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program reports for the next draw along with a colour
code of hits/bonus number we had...
(the bonus number:notme: could show up anywhere)

(either four, three, or five hits most of the time from here) :agree:
01 02 04 05 06 07
09 10 11 13 15 16
17 18 19 24 27 30
31 32 34 37 39 40
41 42 43 45 47 48

No more than three from here is most likely:
(2 hits came from here in last draw)
03 08 12 14 20 21
22 23 25 26 28 29
33 35 36 38 44 46
49

For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
[4 and 2]: 341
[3 and 3]: 268
[5 and 1]: 234
[2 and 4]: 084
[6 and 0]: 046
[1 and 5]: 023
[0 and 6]: 004

Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 
S

Sheba

Member
No winners last time..
Jackpot grows to 9 Million!


Sheba__:santa: :dog:~~~
Wishing everyone a Merry Christmas...:santa:
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Based on DOE and the UseLess numbers
for the draw 2178:

My most probable numbers are:
7,14,32,39,20

Followed by
1,28,34,44,46


All of the above based on DOE (Design of Experiments) theory
which indicated that the UseLess numbers are:
3,4,5,6,8
10,11,12,15,16,17,18,
21,22,25,29
30,35,36,37,38
40,42,43,45,47,48,49


All of the above are very daring, by to win we have to have extreme hypotheses.
 
G

gsobier

Member
...yes, this is daring... ...could happen... ...do you have results for the last 500 draws?...

Nick Koutras said:
Based on DOE and the UseLess numbers
for the draw 2178:

My most probable numbers are:
7,14,32,39,20

Followed by
1,28,34,44,46


All of the above based on DOE (Design of Experiments) theory
which indicated that the UseLess numbers are:
3,4,5,6,8
10,11,12,15,16,17,18,
21,22,25,29
30,35,36,37,38
40,42,43,45,47,48,49


All of the above are very daring, by to win we have to have extreme hypotheses.
Click to expand...
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
As of the progress of the above sub,

it is in the last automation step.
By the beginning of the week I'll be able
to automate the complete process.

I'll keep you posted.

Let me know if you wish to become a "tester" and apply the above on multiple Lotto Games.
Meanwhile I'll be posting predictions on all
Canadian Lotteries.
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
gsobier said:
...yes, this is daring... ...could happen... ...do you have results for the last 500 draws?...
Click to expand...

The program is a backtesting procedure.

Select any previous Draw and the predictions will come up.

As ofto the exact answer of your question
the answer is no, but you can test ANY previous draw as I said above.

Soon as the automation is complete I'll
be able to to produce the results you are asking for.
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
As of the progress of the above sub,

it is in the last automation step.
By the beginning of the week I'll be able
to automate the complete process.

I'll keep you posted.

Let me know if you wish to become a "tester" and apply the above on multiple Lotto Games.
Meanwhile I'll be posting predictions on all
Canadian Lotteries.
Click to expand...
I would like to test this for the african draw... :agree: :agree2:
 
G

gsobier

Member
...:agree2:... ...both 6/49 and Ontario 49 are the ones I'm interested in:agree:... ...how long would it take for one test on a Pentium III with 533Mhz processor?...
Nick Koutras said:
The program is a backtesting procedure.

Select any previous Draw and the predictions will come up.

As ofto the exact answer of your question
the answer is no, but you can test ANY previous draw as I said above.

Soon as the automation is complete I'll
be able to to produce the results you are asking for.
Click to expand...
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
gsobier said:
...:agree2:... ...both 6/49 and Ontario 49 are the ones I'm interested in:agree:... ...how long would it take for one test on a Pentium III with 533Mhz processor?...
Click to expand...
Good question ...I also had this in mind using my dino to get the data while I'm doing something else with my good laptop... :agree: :agree2:
 
G

gsobier

Member
...you'd be so lucky... ...the PIII is all I got:bawl:...
Dennis Bassboss said:
Good question ...I also had this in mind using my dino to get the data while I'm doing something else with my good laptop... :agree: :agree2:
Click to expand...
 
K

Karnac

Member
Dennis

When I was going through some of the archived posts I came across several referring to best sets of numbers for 649. Do you have anything up to date in regards to this .... is there such a thing as an alltime best set or sets? Just wondering.........

:xmas:
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Karnac said:
Dennis

When I was going through some of the archived posts I came across several referring to best sets of numbers for 649. Do you have anything up to date in regards to this .... is there such a thing as an alltime best set or sets? Just wondering.........

:xmas:
Click to expand...
I do have a few good one.....But what kind of best sets do you want?
like......Numbers in the pool and for what hitters...6,5 4 or else ? :confused:
 
K

Karnac

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
I do have a few good one.....But what kind of best sets do you want?
like......Numbers in the pool and for what hitters...6,5 4 or else ? :confused:
Click to expand...

Well ...what I had in mind was say a 12 number set that has produced an above average amount of perhaps 5 hitters. I can find out how many 3,4,5,6, and 7 hits have come from any pool of numbers with the GH program, but it is extremely time consuming alternating numbers to come up with an optimized set of 12 numbers. Then perhaps using these as a static set, along with longshots or missing primes to complete a 14 or 15 number set. Along these lines the 12 number set could also be adjusted to delete numbers that have skipped a great number of draws and include numbers that are extremely active (say 3-4 hits in 10 previous draws)....make any sense?

:xmas:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top