# 6/49 Discussion For August 30, 2003

#### luckystrike

##### Member
AWESOME

Beaker said:
spent \$40 won \$70 - had 7 3's

I'll take it

THE BIG ONE IS COMING....

#### luckystrike

##### Member
MY FOCUS...

NO TIME TO PLAY LAST DRAW... ...BUT MY FOCUS THIS DRAW WILL BE...LD8'S

AND I'LL BE PLAYING THESE TWO GEMS AS MY DN'S!!!!!!!!

...40..41..

AND IF 45 SHOWS UP IN S-7...I'LL BE USING # 40..&..45..AS MY DN'S.....

#### gsobier

##### Member
Sheba:

That report is just a rough guide... ...there are many things under the tip of the iceberg to make it all happen. My programs have produced everything from a zero hitter to a five hitter... ...waiting for a five+Bonus and a six hitter to add to the collection.

Regards,
George
Sheba said:
How does your program win overall?

Sheba__ ~~~ ™ !
--------------------------------------------------------------

#### Maggie

##### Member
Hey, lucky, I hope you find some lucky ones here this week-end and then let me know where you got them.

Have fun at your ball tourney!!

#### Geenie

##### Member
Dartboard picks:

Min / Max

1 / 3 02 48 17 22 24 39
1 / 3 28 45 03 42 49 18 48
2 / 5 01 02 04 06 11 12 13 15 25 27 28 31 35 45 47 48
1 / 3 26 05 02 39 16 06 33 23
1 / 2 04 22 18 34 26

#### Nick Koutras

##### Member
LDs 1 have missed, expected 1-2
C2s 43442122414233342526 have missed, expected 2-3
C3s 41424344454643 have missed, expected 1-3

If we combine all these numbers we will come up with:
011121314142434445333425262122

If now assume that:
Let say that 0 from the above will come.
Then what comes when min=0 max=0 from the above come?

LottoStatisticsXL tells us that 46,07,12,23,47,13 are the ones that then will come.

So in case we were wrong on the original assumptions we use these
numbers as min=0 max=2

But if we are correct on the original selection of number
then we will shalt have 2 min to 4 max from the original numbers.
So doing one more test with that assumption,
we come up with an intersection of the above numbers
27,04,46,14,32,47,03

We shall expect 1-3 from these.

This is not a very accurate test doing it manually.
So I'm preparing a subroutine that will accomplish this without errors.