6/49 Discussion For April 10, 2004
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
LosTed said:
Most of us have some kind of software that we use. Some have made there own while others have bought them and then some depend on the WWW for stats and some also depend on others...Lots of people get lots of info on this Board so keep posted....
Sheba__
~~~ Everybody's got a dream....GO! LEAFS! GO!
Sheba said:Most of us have some kind of software that we use. Some have made there own while others have bought them and then some depend on the WWW for stats and some also depend on others...Lots of people get lots of info on this Board so keep posted....
Sheba__
Everybody's got a dream....GO! LEAFS! GO!
.
oh ok i understand...
thanks
.Frank:
I'm not very good in predicting at all... ...I've assemble sort of order to chaos for everyone. When (if ever), I do get good a predicting many numbers to hit, I'll let you guys know. So far, I've been getting at least one hit in a small list and its not perfect. Thats about all there is from that department.
If I did post numbers, I'd probably say don't
play them
.
Those statistics you are discussing are interesting... ...I've done nothing beyond keeping track of each category. I can accurately state the 6 hitters total for 1,000 draw is pretty much stable at around 50. I've seen it a few more than 50 and 49 is about the lowest. Your expected count for 6 hitters of 42 times makes my report look good, I guess
.
Regards,
George
I'm not very good in predicting at all... ...I've assemble sort of order to chaos for everyone. When (if ever), I do get good a predicting many numbers to hit, I'll let you guys know. So far, I've been getting at least one hit in a small list and its not perfect. Thats about all there is from that department.
If I did post numbers, I'd probably say don't
play them.Those statistics you are discussing are interesting... ...I've done nothing beyond keeping track of each category. I can accurately state the 6 hitters total for 1,000 draw is pretty much stable at around 50. I've seen it a few more than 50 and 49 is about the lowest. Your expected count for 6 hitters of 42 times makes my report look good, I guess
.Regards,
George
hot4 said:
:::46! gsobier said:Frank:
I'm not very good in predicting at all... ...I've assemble sort of order to chaos for everyone. When (if ever), I do get good a predicting many numbers to hit, I'll let you guys know. So far, I've been getting at least one hit in a small list and its not perfect. Thats about all there is from that department.
If I did post numbers, I'd probably say don't
Those statistics you are discussing are interesting... ...I've done nothing beyond keeping track of each category. I can accurately state the 6 hitters total for 1,000 draw is pretty much stable at around 50. I've seen it a few more than 50 and 49 is about the lowest. Your expected count for 6 hitters of 42 times makes my report look good, I guess
Regards,
George
This is a very important information George. If your set of 30 numbers gets 6hits at least 49 times in 1000 draws, that's a stable advantage of 15% better than the odds.
The expected count (42 in 1000) is not mine
; 30 numbers hit 6 numbers in 23,55 draws (expected!) and in 1000 draws you expect to hit 42,46 times. May be now you can be more faithful of your set of 30 numbers
To get more information about its stability, you could check the biggest skip between two 6_hits.
Frank:
There is not enough data to really figure out when 6 will hit in the 30... ...I have seen in history 6 hits back-to-back... ...didn't happen this time in 2109.
I guess the lurkers are getting a free ride looking at my report.
Regards,
George
There is not enough data to really figure out when 6 will hit in the 30... ...I have seen in history 6 hits back-to-back... ...didn't happen this time in 2109.
I guess the lurkers are getting a free ride looking at my report
.Regards,
George
hot4 said:This is a very important information George. If your set of 30 numbers gets 6hits at least 49 times in 1000 draws, that's a stable advantage of 15% better than the odds.
The expected count (42 in 1000) is not mine
May be now you can be more faithful of your set of 30 numbers
To get more information about its stability, you could check the biggest skip between two 6_hits.
peter said:I'd like to install a smart comment here, but I can't think of one, must be suffering writers block, or something. I hope this condition does'nt last.:
Any comment coming from you Peter is a Smart one..
Sheba__
~~~ Everybody's got a dream....GO! LEAFS! GO!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited: