roger.www said:$5000.00 refund tonight..Thanks to KC's carelessness.
35-39-40-63-64-66-68
Many thanks to blitzed also, and his extremely helpful web page.
Thanks guys..from 649 I had $160 refunded. I reinvested $100xcentric said:congrats. although when i looked at the numbers tonight, seemed more altered than most previous nights! i guess Roger played most high numbers tonight? btw, how many lines did you play?
best i got was 5/6 tonight.
roger.www said:$5000.00 refund tonight..Thanks to KC's carelessness.
35-39-40-63-64-66-68
Many thanks to blitzed also, and his extremely helpful web page.
roger.www said:$5000.00 refund tonight..Thanks to KC's carelessness.
35-39-40-63-64-66-68
Many thanks to blitzed also, and his extremely helpful web page.
roger.www said:$5000.00 refund tonight..Thanks to KC's carelessness.
35-39-40-63-64-66-68
Many thanks to blitzed also, and his extremely helpful web page.
roger.www said:Thanks guys..from 649 I had $160 refunded. I reinvested $100
of that - $80 on 7 numbers, the rest 5#
QUOTE]
Hi Roger. I'm curious if you could tell us which method you chose to play this time?
Looking at the results from Ont. Keno, I see that in the previous days, there were more numbers from the 01-35 group than normal. Your winning numbers are almost all part of the 36-70 group so I am assuming you were betting on numbers from the higher part of the board because these numbers were more absent than normal in the few draws before.
In the past, you have talked about repeat analysis. Did you use this to play this time? Were you looking at the numbers from the previous draw, the third previous draw and the fifth previous draw?
80 combos is a lot. I know that in the past, you've said that it was a good idea to choose 13 numbers or so and mix them using Blitzed site. Is that what you did this time? If so, would you suggest choosing 13 numbers and mixing 80 lines from those 13 ? Or, maybe create four different groups of 13 numbers and creating 20 combos from each for a total of 80?
My guess is the second option is better but I would like your professional opinion on that.
I may try this on paper for a while to see if I can produce some good results. I will try with only 4-5-6 number lines to start. First, analyse the previous results to choose four sets of 13 numbers. Then create 20 four-number lines from each for a total of 80. See what happens. If it produces good results, move up to five-number lines and so on.
rukdngme said:got one line 5 of 6 for $25 refund will try again tonite with low numbers
At blitzed's web page I created several samples from differentLooking at the results from Ont. Keno, I see that in the previous days, there were more numbers from the 01-35 group than normal. Your winning numbers are almost all part of the 36-70 group so I am assuming you were betting on numbers from the higher part of the board because these numbers were more absent than normal in the few draws before.
wheeler1 said:what a load of bs again from this guy.
Anybody can say they won without showing proof, as this person does.
Scan in the winner cheque with your name blocked out and then ok, otherwise your full of it !!
roger.www said:Your SIR are in IDIOT and a FOOL
Like I have the time to scan cheques to prove something to some idiota at an internet forum !!
get a life !
wheeler1 said:yes exactly the answer i would expect from a LIAR !!
Jimmy70 said:Wheeler,
why would roger lie about winning $5k or someone else for that matter...... if you look at it he only won $5k not $50k or $1 million
How would you feel if you won a big prize and some on a forum called you lair!
treat others like you want to be treated...... just my 2 cents!
Jimmy70