**okies**

since WINHunter has a selector method that allows you differing ways to cross the chart, here is what I came up with....

13: 11, 5 of 6

12: 10, 0 of 6

11: 10, 1 of 6

10: 10, 2 of 6

9: 11, 1 of 6

8: 12, 2 of 6

7: 12, 2 of 6

6: 10, 2 of 6

5: 11, 2 of 6

4: 18, 2 of 6

3: 17, 3 of 6

2: 12, 0 of 6

1: 16, 5 of 6

Using the "additive method" as you described, and using just the HIGH numbers from the addition of the numbers that scored based upon the SINGLE last draw. Now I am using the filter optimizer to tell me what depth settings are best suited for the last TEN draws.

Here is another history setting results...

25: 17, 1 of 6

24: 18, 2 of 6

23: 10, 1 of 6

22: 11, 2 of 6

21: 12, 0 of 6

20: 16, 3 of 6

19: 16, 0 of 6

18: 12, 0 of 6

17: 10, 1 of 6

16: 13, 3 of 6

15: 10, 3 of 6

14: 17, 2 of 6

13: 16, 2 of 6

12: 12, 4 of 6

11: 12, 1 of 6

10: 14, 5 of 6

9: 16, 2 of 6

8: 15, 5 of 6

7: 12, 1 of 6

6: 16, 2 of 6

5: 14, 2 of 6

4: 13, 3 of 6

3: 13, 1 of 6

2: 11, 1 of 6

1: 11, 2 of 6

These look VERY promising Dennis!

Such low predicted counts with such decent match counts.

We will have to talk more on the double announcer theories and such. I need to run and build an installation setup and upload it to sourceforge now... I will have to play with this Processor next week though!

Andrew

BTW, thanks again for your valuable input!!