Missing Decade Skip Chart

peter

Member
To Beaker, or anyone else, I mentioned Beaker first, not to single him out from others, but he is relidgeous when it comes to info on missing decades.
My Question is this:
Does anyone keep a skip chart on each of the five decades?
 

Beaker

Member
Peter, I don't specifically calculate hit/skip for missing decade but could generate that data.

What I am looking at now for missing decade is something similar to hot/cold.

For example, look at the last 10 draws. Decade skip candidates are decades that have missed at least 2 times in the last 10 and 1 time in the last 5.

Based on that criteria, for 2020, 10's and 20's are on the radar :agree:
 

gsobier

Member
Peter:

I've been looking in that area as a matter of fact. It make alot of sense according to me and what Beaker preaches.

Regards,
George:)

peter said:
To Beaker, or anyone else, I mentioned Beaker first, not to single him out from others, but he is relidgeous when it comes to info on missing decades.
My Question is this:
Does anyone keep a skip chart on each of the five decades?
 
This a sample of such report

I have problems posting correctly
empty values.
Does any body know the answer to such a question.

Back to the report.
If more draws are required just post your requirements


DrID Numbers 0 1 2 3 4
2020 14 18 22 23 31 45 _ 2 2 1 1
2019 06 16 20 29 33 45 1 1 2 1 1
2018 06 12 15 25 31 47 1 2 1 1 1
2017 03 07 16 26 38 47 2 1 1 1 1
2016 11 17 29 39 41 48 _ 2 1 1 2
2015 07 32 37 38 44 45 1 _ _ 3 2
2014 05 13 15 20 24 42 1 2 2 _ 1
2013 04 20 28 33 43 48 1 _ 2 1 2
2012 05 12 31 35 37 46 1 1 _ 3 1
2011 06 07 19 29 43 47 2 1 1 _ 2
2010 03 17 20 30 32 35 1 1 1 3
2009 06 09 14 29 34 45 2 1 1 1 1
2008 04 12 40 43 48 49 1 1 _ _ 4
2007 08 18 21 26 42 48 1 1 2 _ 2
2006 05 07 09 25 28 48 3 _ 2 _ 1
2005 08 10 15 16 31 46 1 3 _ 1 1
2004 15 21 31 36 44 49 _ 1 1 2 2
2003 01 25 32 33 34 35 1 _ 1 4
2002 05 07 18 30 37 46 2 1 _ 2 1
2001 04 06 07 18 46 47 3 1 _ _ 2
2000 05 24 31 37 38 47 1 _ 1 3 1
1999 02 20 30 43 44 47 1 _ 1 1 3
1998 07 15 29 33 40 45 1 1 1 1 2
1997 16 18 21 22 32 33 _ 2 2 2
1996 08 20 22 24 33 44 1 _ 3 1 1
1995 06 08 19 27 45 46 2 1 1 _ 2
1994 05 17 22 34 40 47 1 1 1 1 2
1993 01 05 18 19 24 28 2 2 2
1992 02 06 17 34 46 48 2 1 _ 1 2
1991 03 24 27 29 32 45 1 _ 3 1 1
1990 03 11 12 25 32 38 1 2 1 2
1989 08 23 29 34 40 47 1 _ 2 1 2
1988 15 23 24 28 30 41 _ 1 3 1 1
1987 07 09 33 35 45 47 2 _ _ 2 2
1986 01 05 29 43 44 48 2 _ 1 _ 3
1985 01 06 29 34 41 46 2 _ 1 1 2
1984 09 14 17 32 39 49 1 2 _ 2 1
1983 18 22 26 29 35 37 _ 1 3 2
1982 04 06 11 25 30 44 2 1 1 1 1
1981 15 17 25 36 38 45 _ 2 1 2 1
 

GillesD

Member
Signatures for decades

Why complicate life. An easy way to identify the decades is a 5-digit number where each digit represents the number of occurences in each decade (and 0 can be used).

So for draw #2020 with 14-18-22-23-31-45, it becomes 02211 and for draw # 1993 with 01-05-18-19-24-28, we get 22200.

Values can then go from 00005 to 50000. This allow for easy indexing, sorting, calculating frequencies, etc.

And I have to agree with you for the choice of decades. For me, decades are respectively 1-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49.
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Signatures for decades

Gilles:

That is a darn good point! It is possible to simply sort and count to see what the most "favorite" decade arrangement is this way too:agree2:.

I've done this for HOT/warm/cool/COLD and hits with HOT are most common as expected but not too much. Its surprising to see many sets had more COLD than HOT too. I should point out, there are some combinations which do come out more often than others. Keying on them will help because the long shot is just that, a long shot so playing less of those is common sense.

Regards,
George:)

GillesD said:
Why complicate life. An easy way to identify the decades is a 5-digit number where each digit represents the number of occurences in each decade (and 0 can be used).

So for draw #2020 with 14-18-22-23-31-45, it becomes 02211 and for draw # 1993 with 01-05-18-19-24-28, we get 22200.

Values can then go from 00005 to 50000. This allow for easy indexing, sorting, calculating frequencies, etc.

And I have to agree with you for the choice of decades. For me, decades are respectively 1-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49.
 

Beaker

Member
Re: Signatures for decades

GillesD said:
Why complicate life. An easy way to identify the decades is a 5-digit number where each digit represents the number of occurences in each decade (and 0 can be used).

So for draw #2020 with 14-18-22-23-31-45, it becomes 02211 and for draw # 1993 with 01-05-18-19-24-28, we get 22200.

Values can then go from 00005 to 50000. This allow for easy indexing, sorting, calculating frequencies, etc.

And I have to agree with you for the choice of decades. For me, decades are respectively 1-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49.
GillesD, this is not what I was referring to. :no:

Hit/skip by decade would be over all draws - not within draw. So, for example take all the draw numbers where the first decade - 1-9 - misses. Then subtract the draw #'s and -1 which gives hits by decade. Then averages, standard dev, max length etc can be calculated.

The question to answer is how long will decade 1 (1-9) hit before it misses?

Which decade out of 10's, 20's 30's 40's misses the most , average hits for each.?
 

Ben

Member
decades hits chart

Decades........times hit................%..............last 10 games..
01-09............2552...................18.0%.........12...........17.1%
10-19............2767...................19.6%.........13...........18.6%
20-29............2854...................20.2%.........14...........20.0%
30-39............2981...................21.1%.........14...........20.0%
40-49............2986...................21.1%.........17...........24.3%
 

gsobier

Member
Re: decades hits chart

Ben:

Its been a while since we have seen posts from you. Thank you for providing the answer to exactly what I've been talking about:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)

Ben said:
Decades........times hit................%..............last 10 games..
01-09............2552...................18.0%.........12...........17.1%
10-19............2767...................19.6%.........13...........18.6%
20-29............2854...................20.2%.........14...........20.0%
30-39............2981...................21.1%.........14...........20.0%
40-49............2986...................21.1%.........17...........24.3%
 

peter

Member
Re: decades hits chart

Ben said:
Decades........times hit................%..............last 10 games..
01-09............2552...................18.0%.........12...........17.1%
10-19............2767...................19.6%.........13...........18.6%
20-29............2854...................20.2%.........14...........20.0%
30-39............2981...................21.1%.........14...........20.0%
40-49............2986...................21.1%.........17...........24.3%
Ben, up to and including draw 2020 my decades chart shows,
Decade 1...2551
Decade 2...2768
Decade 3...2853
Decade 4...2981
Decade 5...2987
Both charts add up to 14,140 numbers drawn, it won't change the pecentages any, we are plus/minus 1 from each others charts.
I only point this out, not to be critical, these cross references are important, so that each of us can maintain accuracies, I appreciate the above chart, allowing me to cross reference, my imformation with yours.:agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Re: decades hits chart

Peter and Ben:

I could run totals for this too. We might be able to figure out where the discrepancy is coming from.

Regards,
George:)

peter said:
Ben, up to and including draw 2020 my decades chart shows,
Decade 1...2551
Decade 2...2768
Decade 3...2853
Decade 4...2981
Decade 5...2987
Both charts add up to 14,140 numbers drawn, it won't change the pecentages any, we are plus/minus 1 from each others charts.
I only point this out, not to be critical, these cross references are important, so that each of us can maintain accuracies, I appreciate the above chart, allowing me to cross reference, my imformation with yours.:agree2:
 

GillesD

Member
Decades data

Your data is right, Peter. I get the same results:

Without the bonus number:
01 - 09: 2196 times or 18.1% -- expected value: 18.4%
10 - 19: 2357 times or 19.4% -- expected value: 20.4%
20 - 29: 2437 times or 20.1% -- expected value: 20.4%
30 - 39: 2556 times or 21.1% -- expected value: 20.4%
40 - 49: 2574 times or 21.2% -- expected value: 20.4%


Including the bonus number:
01 - 09: 2551 times or 18.0% -- expected value: 18.4%
10 - 19: 2768 times or 19.6% -- expected value: 20.4%
20 - 29: 2853 times or 20.2% -- expected value: 20.4%
30 - 39: 2981 times or 21.1% -- expected value: 20.4%
40 - 49: 2987 times or 21.1% -- expected value: 20.4%
 
Last edited:

Rebeckah

Member
Interesting. Texas lottery also is heavier on 30s & 40s. This data is solid proof that birthday bets are NOT best. :agree:
 

dwoods99

Member
So bottom line, over the whole history of Lotto 6/49, the real results are very close to the expected values. I wonder what the values are for this century (2001 - present), the last 100 draws and the last 50 draws ? Any takers...
 

GillesD

Member
Data for decades

All data is in the following format
A – Decade
B – Actual number of times (for 6 main numbers)
C – Expected number of times (for 6 main numbers)
D – Actual number of times (including the Bonus number)
E – Expected number of times (including the Bonus number)

Current century – 252 draws (#1769 – 2020)
01-09: 293 (278) -- 347 (324)
10-19: 284 (309) -- 333 (360)
20-29: 307 (309) -- 361 (360)
30-39: 298 (309) -- 349 (360)
40-49: 330 (309) -- 374 (360)

Last 100 draws (#1921 – 2020)
01-09: 117 (110) -- 139 (129)
10-19: 112 (122) -- 130 (143)
20-29: 128 (122) -- 150 (143)
30-39: 116 (122) -- 137 (143)
40-49: 127 (122) -- 144 (143)

Last 50 draws (#1971 – 2020)
01-09: 59 (55) -- 71 (64)
10-19: 51 (61) -- 59 (71)
20-29: 59 (61) -- 69 (71)
30-39: 63 (61) -- 76 (71)
40-49: 68 (61) -- 75 (71)

Note: all expected values are rounded to an integer number
 
Top