March 22 Picks

LT

LT

Administrator
Thanks again Maggie for starting the 649 numbers.

Here is my set of 20.

02,03,05,07,08,10,12,16,18,19
20,23,25,28,33,35,38,40,41,48

All the Best of Lotto Luck to Everyone!
 
wazzappenning

wazzappenning

Member
ive been using three sets of numbers. LT s , and two sets of mine. mine are based on the frequency of numbers. i took the last 20 draws and looked at the total draws of each number, (based on the lotto newsletter you get at the corner store) my first numbers were based on the fact that all the numbers drawn, (except for a couple) had a fraquency of (something like ) 265-280 times drawn. i came up with 23 numbers and randomly played them in a 10 dollar ticket. at the time, had i wheeled the 23 numbers i would have gotten 5 out of 6 on the first draw, and 6 out of 6 on the second draw. since then they have done less well. my next idea was to do this with each individual number in the combinations of the draws. well this time, (march 22) i paid 10 dollars for LT s numbers, 12 dollars for the individual number technique and 12 dollars for the old frquency technique (10 plus 1 combination of the most unlikeley numbers to show up..., like we saw on last saturdays draw) and won 10 dollars on LT s numbers , 10 on the old frequency numbers, and 10 on the new individual frequency of numbers. total loss 4 dollars. i think i will play the same munbers again next draw. the total of all these numbers comes to 38. i think thats too much to wheel. i could knock off the most unlikeley numbers to show and get mabey 32 numbers to wheel. i wonder what that would cost????
 
M

mirage

Member
wazzappenning said:
ive been using three sets of numbers. LT s , and two sets of mine. mine are based on the frequency of numbers. i took the last 20 draws and looked at the total draws of each number, (based on the lotto newsletter you get at the corner store) my first numbers were based on the fact that all the numbers drawn, (except for a couple) had a fraquency of (something like ) 265-280 times drawn. i came up with 23 numbers and randomly played them in a 10 dollar ticket. at the time, had i wheeled the 23 numbers i would have gotten 5 out of 6 on the first draw, and 6 out of 6 on the second draw. since then they have done less well. my next idea was to do this with each individual number in the combinations of the draws. well this time, (march 22) i paid 10 dollars for LT s numbers, 12 dollars for the individual number technique and 12 dollars for the old frquency technique (10 plus 1 combination of the most unlikeley numbers to show up..., like we saw on last saturdays draw) and won 10 dollars on LT s numbers , 10 on the old frequency numbers, and 10 on the new individual frequency of numbers. total loss 4 dollars. i think i will play the same munbers again next draw. the total of all these numbers comes to 38. i think thats too much to wheel. i could knock off the most unlikeley numbers to show and get mabey 32 numbers to wheel. i wonder what that would cost????
Click to expand...

wazz,
Not sure but seem common sense to me that this system of yours would work sometimes surprisingly well sometimes well enough that something shows but not enuf to pay and sometimes not very well at all. Can you detect any kind of historical pattern to it or maybe it is pointless to go there...
 
wazzappenning

wazzappenning

Member
no history, but seems to work well for 2 or 3 draws, then tapers off. i hadnt done it for a while since i wasnt getting a frequency pattern,( the frquencies were all over the place) but i did it again 2 weeks ago and it seemed to work well,( again for the first 2 draws and then taper off) my numbers weren t wheeled in the right combinations to get big money though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top