LTs 20 Lotto 649 07/07/07 to 08/08/07
- Thread starter LT
- Start date
Here, http://www.ccrwest.org/cover/t_pages/t4/k6/C_20_6_4.html.gz, is a great 20,6,4 wheel.
It takes only 382 lines and there is sure 4 if 6 are right, and it costs only $764. Not sure what $ amount four number prizes are, and what is possibility of having 6 among 20 numbers, so there would be a four numbers prize……
So if someone makes this $764 amount in an hour or so somehow…or if has a money tree or such, if something like that exists…
If not , well… may have a breakfast for two years for $764… or travel somewhere a few weeks for a vacation , possibly pay for all inclusive including an air ticket, and also play a few lottery tickets there for this amount of money…
It takes only 382 lines and there is sure 4 if 6 are right, and it costs only $764. Not sure what $ amount four number prizes are, and what is possibility of having 6 among 20 numbers, so there would be a four numbers prize……
So if someone makes this $764 amount in an hour or so somehow…or if has a money tree or such, if something like that exists…
If not , well… may have a breakfast for two years for $764… or travel somewhere a few weeks for a vacation , possibly pay for all inclusive including an air ticket, and also play a few lottery tickets there for this amount of money…
LottoGator
Member
July 7...list of played-once...cold..frequently played..etc
Hi,
No time to update my pages but I'm putting here some of the things I take from Lotto Pro
Played once last 5 draws including last draw:
3
4
6
10*
11
12
13
14
15
17
21
26*
33
34
39*
41
42*
45
48
49
Played twice last 5 draws including last draw
19
20*
24
25*
31
37
44*
47
Not played last 5 draws including last draw (nbr of draws since played)
30(22)
22(18)
1(17)
5(15)
23(12)
29(11)
27(10)
35(10)
38(10)
8(9)
16(9)
28(9)
28(9)
32(9)
9(8)
46(7)
2(6)
18(6)
36(6)
40(6)
Most frequent number in last 1000 draws:
47
45
43
37
40
34
11
26*
46
36
20*
29
6
12
24
10*
Most frequent numbers in last 100 draws:
37
19
6
9
24
33
41
47
20
45
46
3
25
40
49
10
Most frequent numbers last 50 draws:
37
6
19
24
40
7
9
31
13
20
25
26
33
47
3
10
most frequent numbers last 25 draws:
19
33
6
24
37
48
10
11
20
40
49
3
7
16
17
25
I'm taking
19-37-43-47-4-6-11-12-13-14-17-21-24-31-34-41-45-49
and making sets of 4 or 5 then I'm adding 30 and one due number 9-40-3-33 as well as a couple of numbers that have hardly played and only showed up as bonus (ie 18-9-21)(.. and of course I'll be crossing my fingers..
Since I can't play many tickets (could've but had no time and played quick-picked for my groups) I'm going to pick some of the more frequently played numbers in the bunch and I'm using the past 1000 draws for this:
43 37 34 11 6 12 41 4 19 31 then I'll add one 'due' number (see below) and add my c-c-c-old 30
According to my Lotto Pro (including bonus number) these are due : 9, 46, 33
Without including bonus these are due to play: 9-40-3-33 (personal favorite is 40)
note: out of the last 6 draws only the last draw had more even than odds.
La Jolla's smallest combination 5 wheel for 10 numbers
2 3 5 6 8
1 2 4 5 7
1 3 4 6 10
5 6 7 9 10
2 4 8 9 10
1 3 7 8 9
Good Luck!!
LottoGator
Hi,
No time to update my pages but I'm putting here some of the things I take from Lotto Pro
Played once last 5 draws including last draw:
3
4
6
10*
11
12
13
14
15
17
21
26*
33
34
39*
41
42*
45
48
49
Played twice last 5 draws including last draw
19
20*
24
25*
31
37
44*
47
Not played last 5 draws including last draw (nbr of draws since played)
30(22)
22(18)
1(17)
5(15)
23(12)
29(11)
27(10)
35(10)
38(10)
8(9)
16(9)
28(9)
28(9)
32(9)
9(8)
46(7)
2(6)
18(6)
36(6)
40(6)
Most frequent number in last 1000 draws:
47
45
43
37
40
34
11
26*
46
36
20*
29
6
12
24
10*
Most frequent numbers in last 100 draws:
37
19
6
9
24
33
41
47
20
45
46
3
25
40
49
10
Most frequent numbers last 50 draws:
37
6
19
24
40
7
9
31
13
20
25
26
33
47
3
10
most frequent numbers last 25 draws:
19
33
6
24
37
48
10
11
20
40
49
3
7
16
17
25
I'm taking
19-37-43-47-4-6-11-12-13-14-17-21-24-31-34-41-45-49
and making sets of 4 or 5 then I'm adding 30 and one due number 9-40-3-33 as well as a couple of numbers that have hardly played and only showed up as bonus (ie 18-9-21)(.. and of course I'll be crossing my fingers..
Since I can't play many tickets (could've but had no time and played quick-picked for my groups) I'm going to pick some of the more frequently played numbers in the bunch and I'm using the past 1000 draws for this:
43 37 34 11 6 12 41 4 19 31 then I'll add one 'due' number (see below) and add my c-c-c-old 30
According to my Lotto Pro (including bonus number) these are due : 9, 46, 33
Without including bonus these are due to play: 9-40-3-33 (personal favorite is 40)
note: out of the last 6 draws only the last draw had more even than odds.
La Jolla's smallest combination 5 wheel for 10 numbers
2 3 5 6 8
1 2 4 5 7
1 3 4 6 10
5 6 7 9 10
2 4 8 9 10
1 3 7 8 9
Good Luck!!
LottoGator
If you download Saliu's MediaEditor & Lotto WEtomtom said:
it can usually get 5/6 if the 6/20are in your sample ( and sometimes multiple 4/6)
No minimum win guarantee, but you take your chances and hopefully you use the page
that has the good combos, usually bottom of page or middle of page.
well, thanx, but...roger.www said:
1. I like bouncy balls games where JP carries maximum of 50% of prize’s money , or less, and which have a few JP winners in each draw, with rollovers just possibility.
2. I like inexpensive games.
3. In absence of such games I don’t play lottery. After every rain there should be sunshine, so times for playing lottery.
It's gambling- you have to risk money to win money.tomtom said:
My point was there are ways to get 4/6 or 5/6 that don't involve spending
hundreds of $$.
Btw I agree with you about playing inexpensive games. Usually I
play 4 number Keno, and win quite often ( odds are very good 1:189).
That's why I can afford to play the more expensive games.
Basically 4# Keno provides the funding.
roger.www said:
That’s OK... No proof needed, regardless of I don’t believe. I noticed earlier your numbers were always after the draw.
And also, I believe many players or potential players don’t have any time for chasing any numbers.
So, if a game has many really good winners and if it is really inexpensive, then it is worth playing. If not, than it is not… There are always better ways to invest any of money and time, and better times for playing lottery…
if spent $20 and somehow won $10, those aren't winners , imho... That's why like this forum, learned a lot about lottery and various games , and more...
That's not very nice of you to accuse me of dishonesty, that is bad manners,tomtom said:
not something that would raise the level of discourse at this site.
I don't have to prove anything to anyone.
Yes, many people don't have time to chase numbers.
But serious players already have a system in place. It does not take them long to crank out the numbers. There is always the QP system for those
who don't have time. A serious player does not use QPS, he has a good system. he understands that gambling is a hobby, not a form of investment.
Above all, this is about entertainment. For some, chasing the numbers
is a hobby. They do it for the fun of it because they enjoy working with numbers.
If you win something in the process that is great.
Some end up ahead of others.
All I did was point to a system that gets results with a relatively small outlay.
Please download it yourself and try it before accusing me of dishonesty.
roger.www said:
No, I didn’t accuse you of any dishonesty. I said you just claim something without any proofs, and I’m not interested, in both with or without proofs. Some people see a “system” story seriously, some don’t. Different people think differently
I was thinking that people generally do not know much about lottery, odds, ticket prices, and such... Found I was wrong when discovered that it is much easier to get $ 4 million starting JP with much less than a dollar for combination in a game with better odds, than with $2 for a combination in a game with higher odds. Yet, in the first case much bigger prizes' money % goes to lower level prizes...
You see part of the reason people don't share information is attitudes like this.tomtom said:
You want me to analyse lottery stats for hours then post them for you to use
and yet your say "real players don't chase numbers" ?
What excactly are you saying, I should post receipts from the lottery company to prove my winnings to you ?
Btw:I do understand quite a bit about lottery odds, and if you do a search under my name you will find I play inexpensive lotteries with goods odds and that I generally do quite well.
There is no need for me to go a lottery forum and make things up or to provide proof of anything to an anonymous user
on a lottery forum.
Sorry, but you gotta learn both about lottery and people a bit….roger.www said:
not all people are dreamers....not all may believe in what they are served with…
and not all people are realistic …and not all people are between...
Not all people are rich, nor all are poor…
That’s why good lottery corporations have various odds and open games that all have all qualities of good games …
And, the only “system” is playing a for a player 100 % inexpensive and 100 % interesting game... If a player thinks such game is not offered at the local retailer, well, time and places are relative...If not today, maybe tomorrow...
And,one number may repeat, or may not. Five numbers may repeat, and may not. Two numbers may repeat, and may not…same with 3 odd or even numbers…that’s about it…
And, yes, have luck with your “system”….
tomtom said:
And, also,yes, if playing lottery, I do not play QPs, RNGs, no TV or internet draw games, and do not understand the quick picks only or partially quick pick games, since scratch tickets may look to me more shiny, but still I do not play them.....
have my own 10 lucky numbers....and therefore a full 10 number system...
I am glad you have a system but you should learn to keep an open mind.tomtom said:
Failing which you may end up in the $loser hall of fame.
Don't flame someone if they bring something up on the forum.
Often you may not fully understand what they are getting at. Several times I have followed a tip at a lottery site
without questioning the author's methods and won a couple of hundred dollars or more.
Remember lottery prizes are shared among the winners. Sometimes people will let you know
their method only after they have played. Because they don't want to split the prize with you. Particularly if they have spent a lot of time working on their numbers.
Well, basically you just follow your format without accepting anything else, while perceiving things in just your own way.
Lotsa people gotta work hard in order to pay everyday bills, so do not have any time for chasing any numbers. I said something that means clearly that here:
And, this this is how you got this and even quoted something that doesen’t exist.
But, still, you are maybe even right here just unintentionally, since really in my opinion some games have not any many JP winners yearly, monthly, or weekly, and that small lower level prizes, that chasing numbers may look like a waste of time, regardless of wasting money, to someone who did basic chances estimate dividing number of JP winners per year/tickets sold yearly , while observing the lower level prizes…
Whatever, in my opinion still, the only “system” is playing a for a player 100% interesting and 100% inexpensive game. Which odds preference depends on a player’s common sense... How someone may make “lucky” numbers that depends on a player’s inspiration.
Unfortunately, many players may not find such interesting and inexpensive games any easily, due to lack of real competition in organizing lottery games. And, quality of games in some area depends on how a lottery corp is good , or bad …
I suppose without online playing possibility at many places games would be even much worse …
Lotsa people gotta work hard in order to pay everyday bills, so do not have any time for chasing any numbers. I said something that means clearly that here:
tomtom said:
And, this this is how you got this and even quoted something that doesen’t exist.
roger.www said:
But, still, you are maybe even right here just unintentionally, since really in my opinion some games have not any many JP winners yearly, monthly, or weekly, and that small lower level prizes, that chasing numbers may look like a waste of time, regardless of wasting money, to someone who did basic chances estimate dividing number of JP winners per year/tickets sold yearly , while observing the lower level prizes…
Whatever, in my opinion still, the only “system” is playing a for a player 100% interesting and 100% inexpensive game. Which odds preference depends on a player’s common sense... How someone may make “lucky” numbers that depends on a player’s inspiration.
Unfortunately, many players may not find such interesting and inexpensive games any easily, due to lack of real competition in organizing lottery games. And, quality of games in some area depends on how a lottery corp is good , or bad …
I suppose without online playing possibility at many places games would be even much worse …
