luckyhorse said:

**see the reason i dont post them is the same sets of numbers get used every draw if i was to post them i fear that in the event of a big win i would have to split the jackpot with a few of you i guess iam greedy!!!!! but i could change the arrangment and let you guys give it a go with a different set!!!! but then i might be infringing on the copyright of stefan and his lotto system **

Best of luck for winning the big one on a system that I think is flawed.

As you have stated above you do not want to share the system so when you win the big one you wont have to share with many.

Will guess what......What about the other people who have bought the same design.

Yes I agree with you that you will have 2 (or 3) 3 number wins. How can you not. Every 2 number combination has been covered so with 5 more balls (4+B) still to be drawn from 47 you have a 1 in 9.4 chance of a matching ball coming up (infact it will be less than this because you are covering more than the theoretical minimum required).

You would have read a calculation that Nick posted that with the 2if2 system set at 82 lines the odds of you winning the lotto are worse than the actual odds to cover it (I think I also said that after the first 2 balls are drawn you start to head backwards - 1 step forward, 2 steps back).

But hey its your money you have forked out to buy a system that can be had for free.

Here are the flaws I see in a 2if2 system;

Its a 2if2

I presume its static....but then its up to the end user to decide what to do with it.

All the members are probably getting a similar wheel...Stefan are you willing to verify this.

Infact why dont you download a copy of covermaster do a cover report and post the report here.

I think you will be suprised at the percentage of cover you have for this wheel.

After the 2if2 which should be 100% there will be a dramatic drop off.