Its sad ... dumb asses are running the game.

m3rs4

Member
Personally i think this $2 per selection for 649 is a joke. If they think the sales are down they should cut the price/selection to drive up sales or the ppl who buy tickets.

The 100% price increases (per selection) reduces your chance of winning (COW) by HALF; although there is a new 2/6 $5 bux win, this extra COW (2/6 wins) is very very very very small and its negligible. By all means, this 50% reduction COW affects any wins,ie , 2/6,3/6,4/6,5/6,6/6+ and 6/6. So suppose you are lucky enough to be holding a winning ticket today you need to flip a coin to decide if you can really claim the price money. I hope every player of 649 realise the fact before they buy into the stupidity of those ppl who run the game.

The result of the survey is very questionable. I wonder how many diehard lottery players would like a game of reduction for winning.

Unless my salary is double in the nearest future, or my networth is double and realised overnight from the stock market, I will stop buying 649 religiously twice a week.

649 is the game for the riches; Not for those who want to be rich.
 
How about playing Pik 4? Pik 4 is the mini-keno version of 649. For $1, you pick four numbers (these forums here at lotto649.ws show some really good numbers to choose from) and if you land two numbers, you win $2. If you get three, you win $50, and if you win all four, you win $2000. What's even better is if you feel you have a better chance at winning, you can increase the bet to $2 or $5 to 2x or 5x your winnings!

But here's the best part: Usually, if I win $2 in Pik 4, I use the winning to buy one of those $2 649s.
 

Sidebar

Top