I do not know if anybody here noticed the latest result in the U.K 6/49 lottery: the winning numbers are 20 - 21 - 23 - 24 - 27 - 28, all numbers in the same decade.
Besides all numbers in the same decade with its low probability (only 924 combinations or 0.0066%), you could say that the difference between the highest and lowest number being less or equal to 8 (28 - 20 = 8) also has few possible combinations (2,324 or 0.0166%) as well as the 2-2-2 split of consecutive numbers (with at least on number between each pair) also with not a hery high probability (13,244 combinations or 0.0947%).
If you combine those 3 conditions, you are left with only 140 possibilities (or 0.0010% of all combinations), not very far from the 44 combinations with 6 consecutive numbers. So it does not seem as far out as some would say to expect a winning combination with 6 consecutive numbers soon (or relatively soon) somewhere in this galaxy.
Besides all numbers in the same decade with its low probability (only 924 combinations or 0.0066%), you could say that the difference between the highest and lowest number being less or equal to 8 (28 - 20 = 8) also has few possible combinations (2,324 or 0.0166%) as well as the 2-2-2 split of consecutive numbers (with at least on number between each pair) also with not a hery high probability (13,244 combinations or 0.0947%).
If you combine those 3 conditions, you are left with only 140 possibilities (or 0.0010% of all combinations), not very far from the 44 combinations with 6 consecutive numbers. So it does not seem as far out as some would say to expect a winning combination with 6 consecutive numbers soon (or relatively soon) somewhere in this galaxy.