I'm trying something new

peter

Member
We have all talked about skips of each number between one drawing to another.
I have talked on several occasions of numbers coming from draws back in increments of tens.
Well, what I'm doing is combining both.
I'm taking each number, sorting it by the appropriate draw ending number, sorting them, and determing the skip of each number in tens.
For example, take the one I have determined that in draws that end in a two it skips about 40 draws.it last came in 2132, so it is due in 2172.
This is the early stages, but I'm doing this for each number, for each draw ending.
When I'm done, I can put all numbers and draw endings on one spread sheet, and I should be able to identify what numbers are due, at the very least, I'll be able to elimanate numbers.
 

peter

Member
When I'm done, I may borrow Mirages idea of "skip sums" only mine will be in increments of ten so the 7 skip sums of each number in tens will be higher.
I believe this will more accurate to find numbers that come in blocks of ten, instead of fiquring out skips by single draws.
There have for example only been 217 draws that end in a two.
I will be able to identify those numbers based on skips of ten, which are hot.
I'm excited, better get busy so I can complete this.
Look forward to your comments.
 

peter

Member
I have to create 490 sub files, each number times the number of draws in each ten group. :sick:
49x10=490.
 

peter

Member
See my first chart in the tips section,
I given the last skip of ALL numbers, in draws that end in a two.
 

tomtom

Member
peter said:
We have all talked about skips of each number between one drawing to another.
I have talked on several occasions of numbers coming from draws back in increments of tens.
Well, what I'm doing is combining both.
I'm taking each number, sorting it by the appropriate draw ending number, sorting them, and determing the skip of each number in tens.
For example, take the one I have determined that in draws that end in a two it skips about 40 draws.it last came in 2132, so it is due in 2172.
This is the early stages, but I'm doing this for each number, for each draw ending.
When I'm done, I can put all numbers and draw endings on one spread sheet, and I should be able to identify what numbers are due, at the very least, I'll be able to elimanate numbers.

Well, don’t intend to make any damage to your attempt but, gotta keep in mind that those nice and colorful balls from the 2132 draw were probably recycled long time ago…mybe it would be better to stick with some little bit newer history occurrences.
However, :goodluck:
 

Karnac

Member
Peter...I'm trying something new too, so please allow me to indulge in your thread:lol: ..... Using the GH program I culled numbers from the last 25 draws and here's 8 low sets I've boiled them down to.

1 2 6 9 12 16 19 33 37
1 2 9 12 18 19 29 33 34 37 43 45
1 2 3 9 12 13 18 19 37 43
1 6 9 12 18 29 31 33 35 43 48
1 6 9 12 14 18 26 27 29 37 43 48
1 9 12 26 33 35 37 43 48
1 3 9 10 12 15 26 27 29 37 43 48
1 2 3 9 12 26 33 37 43 46 48

and 8 high

30 31 32 36 38 40 44 46 47 49
21 22 23 25 28 32 38 40 42 44 49
4 5 7 17 20 21 25 28 32 38 44 49
5 7 17 21 25 32 38 39 41 42 44 46 47
5 7 21 22 23 24 25 28 38 41 44
4 8 17 23 24 25 28 38 41 44 49
8 17 20 22 23 24 25 28 38 41 44 45 49
7 8 11 17 20 24 25 28 38 41 44 45 49

And no this is for amusement only.....

:devil:
 

peter

Member
Re: Re: I'm trying something new

tomtom said:
Well, don’t intend to make any damage to your attempt but, gotta keep in mind that those nice and colorful balls from the 2132 draw were probably recycled long time ago…mybe it would be better to stick with some little bit newer history occurrences.
However, :goodluck:
I think TomTom you missed the point, its not about balls, its about history.
If you looked at the chart in tips, are you going to play the 41 after it has'nt shown in 380 draws in which the draw ending number was 2.
Just another tool to help in the number selection.
Which reminds me, when was the last time you posted any numbers, or helpful comments on the lotto,
I wish you.:goodluck:
 

tomtom

Member
Re: Re: Re: I'm trying something new

peter said:
Which reminds me, when was the last time you posted any numbers, or helpful comments on the lotto,
I wish you.:goodluck:

This last one was very helpful also, I think:agree:... lottery players think in some different ways - some easy spot the difference betweeen new and original ideas, and ones already used that might lead to some money and time wasting.


BTW, thanks for posting your numbers...Hope one day you might post all 43, and make somebody a winner
 

peter

Member
I 'll try to explain the benefit, as I see, for studing draws with the same last digit number, I've been calling this my tens theory.
Instead of looking at past history of 2171 draws, I look at 217 draws that all have (for this draw) the last draw number, digit of two.
All 49 numbers have been drawn in a draw that ends in a two, tonite 7 more numbers will be drawn in draw 2172.
I look at all of the draws, all 217 that end in a two.
I do most of my study on these 217 draws,LD's announcers, etc, and now skips.
By narrowing done the size of the data, it becomes more managable, and a history of 217 draws which is a part of the entire history is easier to focus on.
As Beaker or Dennis , both will tell you of its merits.
But I'm not here to try and convince, I like the other top players am here to share and win. :agree:
It's just another way of looking at things.
Some see the glass half full, others see it as half empty, i see it as a glass with water in it, it depends upon your perspective.:wavey:
 

tomtom

Member
peter said:
I like the other top players am here to share and win. :agree:
It's just another way of looking at things.

Heh...sharing a wining strategy...

Well Mr. Top Player, I'll share a powerful and logical one, which actually might show a pretty decent money return once in a while, just for the beginning

Do wherever what you want with your numbers, skips, frequencies and the other stuff by your own choice.

But, at the end split all 49 numbers in 3 sections... which means in the worst case there will be only 2 wining numbers in each one (no waste of time talking about 2+B) and that doesn’t happen that often…and sometimes you might see 5 or even 6 in one of yours 16 numbers sections…
Which wheels or guaranties you use depends on how badly you wish to see a REALLY decent win any sooner...:agree:
 
Last edited:

hot4

Member
tomtom said:
Heh...sharing a wining strategy...

<snip>............
Which wheels or guaranties you use depends on how badly you wish to see a REALLY decent win any sooner...:agree:

and the money you have for purchasing tickets, the most of the time just a small budget you can afford :cool:
 

tomtom

Member
hot4 said:
and the money you have for purchasing tickets, the most of the time just a small budget you can afford :cool:

In my opinion, that is the trouble why those $2 tickets prices made both angry and disappointed so many actual lottery fans.

No a real lottery enthusiast has same chance like a player who doesn’t care if he/she will waste a few hundreds or even thousands $ in couple of draws. With some pleasant $$$ straightforward available, the same player has an advanced opportunity for a nice amount of lines and furthermore for some first class consulting and tools regarding a cute lottery a- lot-of- money- available- for –playing- probable - advance- wining strategy.

Hopes for winning with a small amount of tickets are quite comparable with worrying about lightening without a real blizzard…


To explain this if something seems unclear, here is a no2 strategy: once in a while there are 6 odd or 6 even wining numbers and more than once in a while there are 5+B odd or even…The lottery fan might jump into the game with some frequencies, skips, decades, last digits, primes, but with a poorly covered 24 numbers wheel… The $$$ guy might jump into the game with the probably same things,but also with a few hundred lines 24 numbers wheel. I would really like to place a bet who might win here, and who might be sorry because of any money loss…
 
Last edited:

peter

Member
Well Mirage, I have to thank you for the idea on "Sum of Skips"
I never thought of it, untell you brought it up, the tens theory is something I had in mind for a few years, so to put the two together seemed like a good idea, thxs again.:agree2: :wavey:
 
I'M TRING SOMETHING NEW ALSO....WINNING ....INSTEAD OF LOSING... :lol: :lol:

I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR FURTHER CONVERSATIONS ON THIS PETER..VERY INTERESTING....:agree:
 

Sidebar

Top