hot pick wheels
- Thread starter Kwc
- Start date
Kwc said:
Kev,
Back in 2001 I looked into pick 4-4-6 for both the UK & Irish bookies betting. - Before such a system was developed.
Sadly for the Irish bookies bet 42 numbers 4 from 6 takes 16104 lines to give a guarantee. - Not much use for a 5k return.
The UK lottery - or any 49 number bookies bet works out to:
49-4-4-6=30763 lines, so again not much use for a realistic entry.
Before anyone asks, sorry the above systems / wheels are not available for publication.
The odds are always against you......
Cheers...
Last edited:
Grandmaster
Member
SRM,
Are you refering to Pick 6 wheels or Pick 4 wheels in your analysis?
Are you refering to Pick 6 wheels or Pick 4 wheels in your analysis?
veronica21
Member
Lotto Wheels for Canada
Hello, would someone please tell me of lottery wheels to try for Canada that are not too expensive?
Liz
Hello, would someone please tell me of lottery wheels to try for Canada that are not too expensive?
Liz
LottoRocket
Member
LottoRocket
Member
Re: Re: Re: Lotto Wheels for Canada
SRM,
Thank you for your reply. I not only have interests in maths, but I am also focused on the practical results and not only unproven theoretical formula's.
Yes, I did spent more than 10,000 hours on a full-time basis to investigate and research many different 649 lotteries worldwide. I thus have no intention to make use of your "hard work & research".
My offer to the person who requested a "not to expensive wheeling" system was aimed to that person.
Your visit to the Commercial Lotto Program Website was unfortunately too short. When you take a good look, you will find Lotto 649 built-in draw trends and extended key-numbers facilities, which is a first in the Lottery world. Plus, this development is specifically aimed only on Lotto 649 lotto players.
My intention is still to provide the limited fully functional demo program to any individual in need. And you know what, it is FREE to use for a month. You can also search for it at "CNet LottoRocket". It is Free-to-try and affordable to buy.
My understanding is that this forum is aimed on serious Lotto players and not freebies hunters, or is my thinking incorrect.
SRM, should you be in need for proven trends to successfully use in program filters, give me a shout.
SRM said:Sadly another paid for system
Someone trying to make a quick $ from the hard work & research of others!
Order LottoRacket Lotto Program for less than $20 @ the price of one or two hamburgers
SRM.
SRM,
Thank you for your reply. I not only have interests in maths, but I am also focused on the practical results and not only unproven theoretical formula's.
Yes, I did spent more than 10,000 hours on a full-time basis to investigate and research many different 649 lotteries worldwide. I thus have no intention to make use of your "hard work & research".
My offer to the person who requested a "not to expensive wheeling" system was aimed to that person.
Your visit to the Commercial Lotto Program Website was unfortunately too short. When you take a good look, you will find Lotto 649 built-in draw trends and extended key-numbers facilities, which is a first in the Lottery world. Plus, this development is specifically aimed only on Lotto 649 lotto players.
My intention is still to provide the limited fully functional demo program to any individual in need. And you know what, it is FREE to use for a month. You can also search for it at "CNet LottoRocket". It is Free-to-try and affordable to buy.
My understanding is that this forum is aimed on serious Lotto players and not freebies hunters, or is my thinking incorrect.
SRM, should you be in need for proven trends to successfully use in program filters, give me a shout.
LottoRocket,
Thank you also for your reply.
The forum is indeed a place for people to exchange ideas & methods. Normally FOC - [Free of charge]
I have revisited your website, the Software being a 30 day trial, paid for there after by an amount translated into hamburgers. I wish you success with it.
I often wonder if a lotto "system" / software, if successful would be published? surely the winning formulae would be closely guarded & used for private gains.
Freebie hunters, myself included, may also be interested in Cover32, a simulated annealing program, Covermaster, or Inninuga. - All free to try & use - with no 30 day limitations.
I will pass on your offer of trends / filters - thank you!
Rgds,
SRM.
Thank you also for your reply.
The forum is indeed a place for people to exchange ideas & methods. Normally FOC - [Free of charge]
I have revisited your website, the Software being a 30 day trial, paid for there after by an amount translated into hamburgers. I wish you success with it.
I often wonder if a lotto "system" / software, if successful would be published? surely the winning formulae would be closely guarded & used for private gains.
Freebie hunters, myself included, may also be interested in Cover32, a simulated annealing program, Covermaster, or Inninuga. - All free to try & use - with no 30 day limitations.
I will pass on your offer of trends / filters - thank you!
Rgds,
SRM.
Last edited:
tomtom said:It seems from some reason most freebies stay unimproved regardless of users’ recommendations and desires and/or authors’ promises …
Therefore, interesting commercial programs and especially ones which are improved regurarly are more than welcomed..
tomtom - you are totally correct regarding the shareware.
I have offered improvements to John Rawson - author of Covermaster, & also Uros, author of Inninuga.
Sadly because of thier other commitments, doubt if they will be actioned.
They both remain fantastic pieces of freeware & continue to create WR systems to this day. - The maths behind them remains very strong.
When it comes to lottery filtering software, as previously mentioned, if a system was so good, I doubt if it would be sold on.
IMHO, I consider a system that could offer a profit would remain
unpublished and used to produced profits for the author.
The author not having to publish/sell his/her work, due to the profits made by his/her sucessful system.
Rgds..
SRM said:
Well, as said it’s pretty bad the programs aren’t either partially commercialized or their authors haven’t had more spare time for possible improvenments ... ...
SRM said:
From some reason some time ago I concluded you were quite proficient regarding coverings and wheels…. Therefore, it’s a bit surprising a person with math skills might believe in any profitable system existence in lottery games…
However, it seems around are still existing some interesting local lotteries, with realistically priced tickets (50 c/ticket or such) and/or smaller matrixes, where a player might have some fun trying a game without experiencing heavy money losses…
tomtom said:Therefore, it’s a bit surprising a person with math skills might believe in any profitable system existence in lottery games…
Exactly my point - why pay someone else to produce a sequence of entries, when a personal selection stands an equal chance of winning.
I rarely bet the Lotto - sometimes I will bet the Irish bookies pick 3. [UK betting]
Sometimes also on a superdraw - I have long since moved away from using a wheeling system to produce the entry. - I just bet my personal preferred numbers. [numbers I consider sit well together - no maths or filters]
Good luck to everyone - with whichever system you decide to use to select your entry.