A lot of lottery companies may say that make games that players like..
There are at least quite a few types of games…
Let’s take a look at just these two, where both with ball machines, some millions JP, own numbers and quick picks both available options at the same time, possible rollovers, TV draws, and such….
First one, is that has that good odds, good all prizes, and ticket prices that surely will sold more than enough combinations that there would be some JP winners…so, almost surely no rollovers…
I suppose players know that, since play that game….
I suppose a lottery corp knows that , too, since made that game, so there would be more than enough combos played for a fine money for the corp, all together with all games in the assortment…..
And, finally, I suppose in this situation if lost some money, players just didn’t like they didn’t won the JP, and any prize, and will try next time…
..
And another one type game, where ticket prices or odds , or both, were that high that there possibly wouldn’t be sold enough combinations to almost surely cover a JP…so possibly none JP winners..
And, I suppose players know that, since play that game ..
and a lottery corp knows that, since made such game, so at the end there would be more than enough combos played for a fine money for the corp,all together with all games in the assortment…..
So, logically, if there is no a JP winner, jackpot then rolls over, and lottery corp may expect more tickets sold in the following draw, and therefore some more money for the corp….
But what is with players then, if lost some money in the draw?
Are players generally happy nobody won the JP, so the some millions JP would be higher, some millions ?
Or not, just didn’t like they didn’t won the JP, and any prize?
Or both, at the same time? I read or heard somewhere there is no possible two different feelings about the same thing at the same time?
Or ,it just doesn’t matter, if JP rolled over or not?
There are at least quite a few types of games…
Let’s take a look at just these two, where both with ball machines, some millions JP, own numbers and quick picks both available options at the same time, possible rollovers, TV draws, and such….
First one, is that has that good odds, good all prizes, and ticket prices that surely will sold more than enough combinations that there would be some JP winners…so, almost surely no rollovers…
I suppose players know that, since play that game….
I suppose a lottery corp knows that , too, since made that game, so there would be more than enough combos played for a fine money for the corp, all together with all games in the assortment…..
And, finally, I suppose in this situation if lost some money, players just didn’t like they didn’t won the JP, and any prize, and will try next time…
..
And another one type game, where ticket prices or odds , or both, were that high that there possibly wouldn’t be sold enough combinations to almost surely cover a JP…so possibly none JP winners..
And, I suppose players know that, since play that game ..
and a lottery corp knows that, since made such game, so at the end there would be more than enough combos played for a fine money for the corp,all together with all games in the assortment…..
So, logically, if there is no a JP winner, jackpot then rolls over, and lottery corp may expect more tickets sold in the following draw, and therefore some more money for the corp….
But what is with players then, if lost some money in the draw?
Are players generally happy nobody won the JP, so the some millions JP would be higher, some millions ?
Or not, just didn’t like they didn’t won the JP, and any prize?
Or both, at the same time? I read or heard somewhere there is no possible two different feelings about the same thing at the same time?
Or ,it just doesn’t matter, if JP rolled over or not?