Guaranteed more succes with less than 10 tickets !!!

S

stefan

Member
Here's a free gift !!! :thumb:

Amazing... I saw an attempt to predict 6 winning numbers from a pool of 30 numbers out of 49 numbers : http://www.lotto649.ws/questions-answers/6835-picking-lottery-numbers.html

Not a single "prediction" from this thread has been successful, which means that the reduction method (playing 30 numbers instead of 49) spoiled the chances to hit the jackpot for the full 100% !!!

I strongly believe that major jackpot games have a better chance to be won by playing all the numbers. Moreover, players think I must be pretty stupid by claiming that most players lose the big jackpot games at the beginning of the draw (after all, the order in which the draw occurs is not important, right ?).

My answer to this is : The order in which the draw occurs is not important, ONCE YOU MATCHED THEM ALL !!! But please, prove me that you don't have a better chance to match them all if you can predict tomorrow's first winning ball (it only takes 9 tickets to successfully "predict" tomorrow's first winning ball by playing all numbers in 9 sets of 6 numbers - which leaves you with 5 balls to hit big) And, please,... prove me how you can possibly win the jackpot if all your tickets fail to match that first winning ball (which happens a lot if you don't play all the numbers !!!)

Now, the big question remains, if one could predict the 6 winning numbers from a pool of 30 numbers out of 49 numbers (haven't seen a prediction yet in the thread I mentioned), how many combinations does he/she has to play to have a guaranteed 6/6 ? Don't be disappointed... It takes 593,775 combinations, baby !!!

The smaller question is interesting as well... If one plays 9 sets of 6 numbers (each of the 49 possible numbers has been played at least once, maximum twice), how much chance does he/she has to win the jackpot ?

Here's the answer... the moment the first winning ball appears, you have 1 or 2 tickets matching the first winning ball (remember, you played them all). 48 balls are still spinning in the tumbler at this time. So in case 1 of your tickets matches the first winning ball (that's the least) you'll have a 1 in 1,712,304 chance to hit the big one. In case you'll have 2 tickets matching the first winning ball, you'll have a 1 in 856,153 chance to hit big.

Now which method is better. Trying to reduce the field of numbers to a point where you spoil your chances to hit big (in this case, it would have taken 593,775 tickets each draw - without any success) , or playing all the numbers with a POSSIBLE success ??? DO THE CALCULATIONS YOURSELF !!!

Best regards,

Stefan
P.S. Feel free to visit my free and newly updated online lottery system guide : http://www.lottotrix.com
 
K

KennyKen

Member
Hey Stefan,

I play the cash five game and want to wheel 20 numbers,,do you have such a wheel, can you post it for me to view.

Thank you,
 
S

stefan

Member
I told you!

stefan said:
Here's a free gift !!! :thumb:

Amazing... I saw an attempt to predict 6 winning numbers from a pool of 30 numbers out of 49 numbers : http://www.lotto649.ws/questions-answers/6835-picking-lottery-numbers.html

Not a single "prediction" from this thread has been successful, which means that the reduction method (playing 30 numbers instead of 49) spoiled the chances to hit the jackpot for the full 100% !!!

I strongly believe that major jackpot games have a better chance to be won by playing all the numbers. Moreover, players think I must be pretty stupid by claiming that most players lose the big jackpot games at the beginning of the draw (after all, the order in which the draw occurs is not important, right ?).

My answer to this is : The order in which the draw occurs is not important, ONCE YOU MATCHED THEM ALL !!! But please, prove me that you don't have a better chance to match them all if you can predict tomorrow's first winning ball (it only takes 9 tickets to successfully "predict" tomorrow's first winning ball by playing all numbers in 9 sets of 6 numbers - which leaves you with 5 balls to hit big) And, please,... prove me how you can possibly win the jackpot if all your tickets fail to match that first winning ball (which happens a lot if you don't play all the numbers !!!)

Now, the big question remains, if one could predict the 6 winning numbers from a pool of 30 numbers out of 49 numbers (haven't seen a prediction yet in the thread I mentioned), how many combinations does he/she has to play to have a guaranteed 6/6 ? Don't be disappointed... It takes 593,775 combinations, baby !!!

The smaller question is interesting as well... If one plays 9 sets of 6 numbers (each of the 49 possible numbers has been played at least once, maximum twice), how much chance does he/she has to win the jackpot ?

Here's the answer... the moment the first winning ball appears, you have 1 or 2 tickets matching the first winning ball (remember, you played them all). 48 balls are still spinning in the tumbler at this time. So in case 1 of your tickets matches the first winning ball (that's the least) you'll have a 1 in 1,712,304 chance to hit the big one. In case you'll have 2 tickets matching the first winning ball, you'll have a 1 in 856,153 chance to hit big.

Now which method is better. Trying to reduce the field of numbers to a point where you spoil your chances to hit big (in this case, it would have taken 593,775 tickets each draw - without any success) , or playing all the numbers with a POSSIBLE success ??? DO THE CALCULATIONS YOURSELF !!!

Best regards,

Stefan
P.S. Feel free to visit my free and newly updated online lottery system guide : http://www.lottotrix.com
Click to expand...


IMPORTANT! Please have a look at this article (Wednesday October 25, 11:48 AM)!!!

A group of university professors and maths experts , who recently won 5 million pounds reveal their winning scheme :

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/25102006/140/revealed-win-lottery.html

Now have a look at my previous post (see quote) !!! I have been preaching this for many years. Looks like I am 100% right after all. And I wouldn't be surprised if these university professors had a peek at my website - www.lottotrix.com - as well.

Best regards,

Stefan
P.S. Think sequential !!!
 
blitzed

blitzed

Member
stefan said:
I have been preaching this for many years. Looks like I am 100% right after all.
Stefan
P.S. Think sequential !!!
Click to expand...

heh! yeah playin the field is good, and wheeling is an ok idea for small numbers of picks...I think people who wheel dozens or hundreds are nuts!

anyway, I don't think I have the patience to play the same numbers consistently heh!

they made a great 4 year investment...I wish they'd have done a break down. was it boring? did they get numerous 4 of 6 & 5 of 6 matches?

blitzed
 
B

Blue71

Member
I have thought of doing that before. By writing out 55 numbers and then writing out 42 numbers for the powerball and then drawing randomly.

But to me these guys are no different then any other system.

The guy in West Virginia that won 300 million said he played the same numbers for 5 years before he won. To me it just doens't make much difference it is the same odds whether you get qick picks or play your own numnbers.

Me, myself I change my numbers slightly each drawing. That is my only strategy.
 
blitzed

blitzed

Member
Blue71 said:
Me, myself I change my numbers slightly each drawing. That is my only strategy.
Click to expand...

yup, it isn't playing if you just play the same boring numbers every time heh! better to have fun chasin it down :)

later,
blitzed
 
T

teddybear

Member
so, this sound good and logical, the real test is have you won anything with this system??? how would this work on the michigan keno game were there are 80 numbers, 22 are drawn and you have to match 10. do i draw 22 out of 80 and then out of the 22 draw 10? just like the lottery? hey thanks for this idea, i will try it on our fantasy 5.
 
T

tomtom

Member
stefan said:
you'll have a 1 in 1,712,304 chance to hit the big one
Click to expand...

There are games with 1712.3% better chances than yours that produce a bunch of losers ( 999 out of 1000) in each draw….

the only reasonable way to become a real winner is to play an inexpensive game which has a lot of winners..while using any lucky numbers...and not spend any much money....if there is a lot of winners, you may become one too, more easily...if loser, then didn't waste much money anyhow...
 
T

tomtom

Member
And, this idea about playing all numbers is very old....Was reading about it at Robert Perkis's posts a whiiile ago...when tickets prices and prize distribution for many seemed better in some games....

He looked like a real lottery fan...and I wished he was a JP winner...
 
T

tomtom

Member
tomtom said:
And, this idea about playing all numbers is very old....
Click to expand...
Yup... searched a few seconds and found one of posts about it from way back in 1995,and didn't look further.. it's not at this forum though......
 
K

knowwhen2play

Member
What Stephan is suggesting sounds more like power numbers to me! Gail Howard calls them power numbers. That is if you have a one, two or three good numbers place them in the key position to be played throught your wheel. They will be in every combination therefore say if you choose 15, 18 and the winning numbers were 04-15-18-24-25 in a pick five game then you would at least have two numbers right. And the rest of your combinations would have at least two numbers right plus any one that had one more would have three right, then four would have four right and five=jackpot! It is my opinion that power wheels have a better chance and pay back much more than a winnings from ordinary wheels. The only thing bad about them is that if your power numbers are wrong then you're out of the jackpot. However if you play more numbers or all of the numbers then it increases the chance you will have more winning combos. :smokin:
 
S

stefan

Member
I am probably the only lottery ebook seller who doesn't pretend to have won a major lottery jackpot. As a matter of fact, I haven't won the BIG one (yet).

But I've seen some "junior posts" about 2if2 and 3if3 guarantees,... (here and somewhere else...)

"2if2" guarantees are not popular because they don't guarantee a major prize...

3if3 guarantees are not popular because they are too expensive to wheel a substantial amounts of lottery numbers...

So for the real cheap players amongst you... Just play all the numbers in a minimum amount of lines (and don't chase a minimum prize guarantee)!

Good luck!!!


Stefan
 
blitzed

blitzed

Member
Hello Stefan,

Quite right, much like the full spectrum picks feature on my 649 webpage:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/649_lottery_picks/

Each of the 9picks represents 11.11%.

OR successfully ditch the lone number that the 9th pick would be built upon...then each of the 8picks represents 12.5% of the field.

it does not seem very far-fetched that the draw, or at least 4 or 5 draw numbers can gravitate neatly into one of 8picks :)

cheers!
blitzed:thumb:
 
R

roger.www

Member
stefan said:
I am probably the only lottery ebook seller who doesn't pretend to have won a major lottery jackpot. As a matter of fact, I haven't won the BIG one (yet).

But I've seen some "junior posts" about 2if2 and 3if3 guarantees,... (here and somewhere else...)

"2if2" guarantees are not popular because they don't guarantee a major prize...

3if3 guarantees are not popular because they are too expensive to wheel a substantial amounts of lottery numbers...

So for the real cheap players amongst you... Just play all the numbers in a minimum amount of lines (and don't chase a minimum prize guarantee)!

Good luck!!!


Stefan
Click to expand...

agree about the 3if 3 wheels etc. I have to disagree with the thrust of your argument however. You really can sometimes pick 5 or 6 of the winning
numbers in a small sample of 13 or 14 numbers. After that you use something like:
http://crazynuts.hollosite.com/my_lottery_quick_picks/

Recently ( within the last 2 months) I have 5/6 ONT 49 (once)
and 4/6 ONT 49 ( 3x) ..4/6 ( CAN649) twice using the above.
The beauty of the above is it's very inexpensive. You draw several samples
12 to 15 numbers and do 10- 15 combos. If the combos don't hit one draw you simply replay them.

The problem with large samples is it's very hard to get
a hit -- not without some very expensive wheeling.

In the past I have used some full spectrum wheels. Never had results better than 3/6
using those.
 
S

stefan

Member
Hi Roger, hi Blitzed

Great imput! Of course, any combination of 6 numbers can be drawn! That's part of the game (and - yes - it is possible that 6 numbers fall in a smaller range of x selected numbers).
As for me, the logics behind a simple strategy (like the one I explained to play all the numbers in a minimum amount of lines) motivates and satifies me more.
Such a strategy also puts an end to "possibly guessing the wrong numbers". At the same time - because of the sequential nature of such a strategy, it turns any pick 6 lottery into a pick 5 lottery. Nice Bonus!
But I agree, the hard part is getting all the winning numbers on one line. And like you said, Blitzed, it "looks" more probable than possible.
But hey, although lottery games aren't designed to make them easy to win, winning them is probable and possible! And winning once is all you need! :)
 
blitzed

blitzed

Member
roger.www said:
In the past I have used some full spectrum wheels. Never had results better than 3/6
using those.
Click to expand...

hiya Roger,

likewise, my best full spectrum match was 3numbers in a big lottery game. however, I don't play much lottery lately.

perhaps I'll add some optional random routines, in an effort to shake out better picks. one thing I could do is allow user to input the last draw, then chop it to distribute the numbers down through the full spectrum picks.

cya,
blitzed:thumb:
 
blitzed

blitzed

Member
hi Stefan,

yes, winning once would do it:agree:

however, I'd likely continue to manipulate numbers, and do lottery programming just for the fun of it...and as an added bonus, as I get older, all these lottery puzzles will likely help keep alzheimers away:hair:

cheers!
blitzed:thumb:
 
M

mikkii

Member
hey blitzed your right have to use the brain to keep alzheimers away iam in the health care field and see that alot .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top