Has anyone on the Forum realized Gail Howard's claim--in her book--Lottery Master Guide--to eliminate 20-25% of the numbers in a 6/49 game thereby turning the lotto into a 6/39 game? I ask this question because it is clear that many subscribers here have their own succesful number elimination systems. And I wouldn't want to spend good money on the book if her claims don't stand up to scrutiny. Please remember that even a 5-10 number elimination reduces one's odds exponentially. Just see how lucky the Aussies are with their 6/45 game which gives everyone a 1 in 8.5 million chance at hitting the jackpot(even before applying any filters!) which, while high, is infinitely preferable to the 6/49 game in Canada, where I am stuck with a 1 in 14 million chance. And this only involves a reduction of 4 digits.
As an aside, is it true that Ms. Howard's system's are very good at collecting Statistical data but much less so at making predictions. I have heard some people make this suggestion on other web sites? I welcome your comments. Regards.
As an aside, is it true that Ms. Howard's system's are very good at collecting Statistical data but much less so at making predictions. I have heard some people make this suggestion on other web sites? I welcome your comments. Regards.
