Do You Now

Ben

Member
Do You Know

THIS HITS COMPAGNON QUINTS (5/6) ARE COMING BACK TWO TIMES in national canadian 6/49
possible coming back for the third, but it is better to avoid to play
it.... better change 1, 2, or 3 numbers:


01-03-19-32-47 ...... 07-21-33-38-42
01-10-16-44-45 ...... 08-34-37-39-47
01-12-18-23-47 ...... 08-34-38-43-46
02-03-13-17-23 ...... 09-11-21-28-37
02-05-29-35-37 ...... 09-13-27-28-38
02-08-12-15-49 ...... 09-27-28-37-46
02-41-42-44-47 ...... 10-17-19-25-35
03-05-08-37-38 ...... 10-30-37-44-49
03-09-10-13-20 ...... 11-18-33-47-49
03-12-18-31-36 ...... 11-33-37-40-46
03-20-22-30-44 ...... 12-16-20-43-44
04-07-36-39-40 ...... 13-18-21-38-44
04-23-33-34-36 ...... 17-29-32-41-42
05-06-33-44-49 ...... 18-19-36-41-42
05-10-35-36-45 ...... 19-24-36-38-41
05-31-34-36-38 ...... 21-24-25-39-49
06-23-30-34-43 ...... 23-27-31-41-42
07-21-33-38-42 ...... 23-29-38-39-43
...... 24-28-33-38-46

for your knowledge...
:read:
 
Last edited:

Ben

Member
Hi Beaker,
no quint have hit 3 or more time, but if you add bonus, yes it is
loock at this and verify at this good link:http://www.lottohome.com/

companion quints with bonus number (5/7)
3 times:
02-12-40-42-45
05-10-35-36-45
09-11-21-28-37
09-11-28-29-37
13-16-21-26-35

and also 6/7 (with bonus)
2 times:
01-03-19-32-37-47
03-04-08-12-28-31
03-12-19-22-35-47
04-12-14-32-33-44

some usefull statistics:

Neighbors, like : 1-2 ,15-16, 48-49 etc... (with BONUS NUMBER)
until draw Sept. 14 2002

times of hit %
767 39.4% no neighbor
794 40.8% pair (1-2, 15-16, etc..)
99 5.1% triad (1-2-3, 15-16-17 etc)
235 12.1% 2 pair or quad (1-2-3-4, 15-16-21-22)
37 1.9 % triad/pair or quint
14 0.7 % 3 pair or 2 triad


ODD AND EVEN ( NO BONUS NUMBER) Until last draw (sept14/02)

ODD EVEN TOTAL % example(only)

0 6 16 0.8% 10-12-14-16-18-20
1 5 151 7.8% 09-12-14-16-18-20
2 4 450 23.1% 09-11-14-16-18-20
3 3 626 32.2% 09-11-13-16-18-20
4 2 488 25.1% 09-11-13-15-18-20
5 1 198 10.2% 09-11-13-15-17-20
6 0 17 0.9% 09-11-13-15-17-19

have Fun and good luck.
 
Last edited:

Beaker

Member
:eek: I forgot about that site Ben, thanks for posting that link. You are correct, it does have some interesting stuff there. :agree2:
 

GillesD

Member
Useful statistics but is it right?

Ben, I have a few problems with some of the statistics you posted:

You say:

Neighbors, like : 1-2 ,15-16, 48-49 etc... (NO BONUS NUMBER)
until draw Sept. 14 2002

times of hit %
767 39.4% no neighbor
794 40.8% pair (1-2, 15-16, etc..)
99 5.1% triad (1-2-3, 15-16-17 etc)
235 12.1% 2 pair or quad (1-2-3-4, 15-16-21-22)
37 1.9 % triad/pair or quint
14 0.7 % 3 pair or 2 triad

My own data says:

times of hit %
1000 51.4% no neighbor
741 38.1% one pair (1-2, 15-16, etc..)
62 3.2% one triad (1-2-3, 15-16-17 etc)
126 6.5% 2 pairs or one quad (1-2-3-4, 15-16-21-22)
16 0.9 % one triad and onepair or one quint
1 0.1 % 3 pairs or 2 triads

There is quite a difference in most cases. My own data is always within 1.0% of the theorical values that would be expected for such combinations.

Like for your 3 pairs or 2 triads, I get 1 time 3 pairs (draw 1291 - with 19-20 / 38-39 / 44-45) but never 2 triads.

For a quad, I have 5 draws (#810, 880, 883, 1279 and 1715) with this characteristic.

Do you have (or somebody else) have data to prove me wrong?
 

GillesD

Member
Good and interesting site, but ...

Yes the site you mentionned has some interesting information but also some odd facts:

If you compare the frequency information for Lotto 6/49 and compared it to an official site (I used Loto-Quebec) that provides the same information, you will find 10 numbers (4, 7, 13, ...) that have a different value.

If you add up the frequencies for all 49 numbers and divide this by 6, you will get 1947. Is that the number of draws up to now (I thought it was 1946) or do they know something about the next draw that I do not?
 
Re: Good and interesting site, but ...

GillesD said:
Yes the site you mentionned has some interesting information but also some odd facts:

If you compare the frequency information for Lotto 6/49 and compared it to an official site (I used Loto-Quebec) that provides the same information, you will find 10 numbers (4, 7, 13, ...) that have a different value.

If you add up the frequencies for all 49 numbers and divide this by 6, you will get 1947. Is that the number of draws up to now (I thought it was 1946) or do they know something about the next draw that I do not?
I have to agree with Gilles here some infos are not accurate!!And as Gilles already stated how come some of these stats are so far away from the expected values???....Maybe somebody should tell them about it...once updated, it would be an interesting site for sure...as it is ...we can't rely on the stats too many mistakes!! :confused:
 

Beaker

Member
Beaker said:
:eek: I forgot about that site Ben, thanks for posting that link. You are correct, it does have some interesting stuff there. :agree2:
As always, the best source for accurate data is players at this site. :agree: :agree2:
 

Ben

Member
Re: Useful statistics but is it right?

GillesD said:
Ben, I have a few problems with some of the statistics you posted:

You say:

Neighbors, like : 1-2 ,15-16, 48-49 etc... (NO BONUS NUMBER)
until draw Sept. 14 2002

times of hit %
767 39.4% no neighbor
794 40.8% pair (1-2, 15-16, etc..)
99 5.1% triad (1-2-3, 15-16-17 etc)
235 12.1% 2 pair or quad (1-2-3-4, 15-16-21-22)
37 1.9 % triad/pair or quint
14 0.7 % 3 pair or 2 triad

My own data says:

times of hit %
1000 51.4% no neighbor
741 38.1% one pair (1-2, 15-16, etc..)
62 3.2% one triad (1-2-3, 15-16-17 etc)
126 6.5% 2 pairs or one quad (1-2-3-4, 15-16-21-22)
16 0.9 % one triad and onepair or one quint
1 0.1 % 3 pairs or 2 triads

There is quite a difference in most cases. My own data is always within 1.0% of the theorical values that would be expected for such combinations.

Like for your 3 pairs or 2 triads, I get 1 time 3 pairs (draw 1291 - with 19-20 / 38-39 / 44-45) but never 2 triads.

For a quad, I have 5 draws (#810, 880, 883, 1279 and 1715) with this characteristic.

Do you have (or somebody else) have data to prove me wrong?

Hi, GillesD
You are right and your data too
it is my mistake my data is counted with Bonus number.
now it is corrected......Sorry
now i am sure , in this forum, they are many experts like you, and if we share some usefull strategies and tips we became the winers.
Thanks Gilles for the correction.
 
Top