Discussion for Nov.23

Maggie

Member
It would be nice to see someone here predict all 6 again.

I'll start by saying that I still have faith that the 1-10-15-18-23 are going to be drawn soon. Looking at 39-43 as well.
 
Maggie said:
It would be nice to see someone here predict all 6 again.

I'll start by saying that I still have faith that the 1-10-15-18-23 are going to be drawn soon. Looking at 39-43 as well.
A big antipode draw is lurking folks....:eek:
 

Beaker

Member
:eek: :eek:

We may have been 1 or 2 draws early

Our 7 open pairs did NOT go and we still have 27 open numbers for the last 4 draws.

Nuff ced :agree:
 
Beaker said:
:eek: :eek:

We may have been 1 or 2 draws early

Our 7 open pairs did NOT go and we still have 27 open numbers

Nuff ced :agree:
Exactly what I have in mind Beaker...many of these open pairs are on the low side...and some on the high side....I'll look at it more....The last draw was the real high draw high no numbers at all under 20...3 from the 40s....some of these 40s might repeat at least one...and boooom here comes are open pairs from the low side... :agree:
 

Beaker

Member
I will post this once again so that those who miss it won't.:tongue2:

It's one of Beaker's Laws and it goes like this:

When you see 21 play 12 - it will hit within 4 draws

Nuff ced :dang:
 
Beaker said:
I will post this once again so that those who miss it won't.:tongue2:

It's one of Beaker's Laws and it goes like this:

When you see 21 play 12 - it will hit within 4 draws

Nuff ced :dang:
The 20-22 is lurking again....42 might repeat here.... :eek2: :eek3:
 
I like the look of 12-22 Beaker...look at draw 1811 the last time that this pair appeared..actually that pair is on is longest skip in his history...And 42 is a nice partner for these 2... :eek:
 

Beaker

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
I like the look of 12-22 Beaker...look at draw 1811 the last time that this pair appeared..actually that pair is on is longest skip in his history...And 42 is a nice partner for these 2... :eek:
We haven't had a repeater in 4 draws which has really :burnt: me - I'm really tempted to let them go :uzi:
 

Maggie

Member
thoughts

Not long ago somebody mentioned something about going back in draws by the 100's. This got me curious and this is what I've come up with, starting with last night's draw. (1965)

1865- no matches
1765- 13-41-42 -45-46-49
1665- 3-12-22-35-40 -47
1565- 1-10-16-38 -44-45
1465- 10-16-28-37-42 -47
1365- 9-21 -25-27-40-42
1265- 2-9-17-25-30-40
1165- 3-9-16-19-32 -47

Here you have all the numbers from last night except the 29. The bonus 47 came up 3 times.

So, I'm thinking if you go back 100 each time starting with Sat. draw which will be 1966, will there be 5 or more from that bunch.
 

Maggie

Member
Continued

In that bunch of numbers starting Sat. which is 1966 alot of the numbers that were drawn have already been mentioned here.

1866- 2-3-4-18-28-43 b15
1766- 11-15-24-30-31-33 b25
1666- 6-16-27-30-34-35 b13
1566- 4-5-9-17-30-41 b20
1466- 7-18-20-21-38-40 b11
1366- 1-3-7-13-39-46 b4
1266- 4-7-10-13-39-46 b49
1166- 17-18-34-41-43-48 b4
1066- 4-9-20-31-45-49 b32

I would be curious to see how many of these might come up on Sat.
 
This is Peter's theory Maggie....This famous player came up with this idea first to my knowledge...but he added a twist to it...Hopefully one day he'll be back and he will explain it to you himself....He is still one if not the most efficient player that I have seen always playing very few numbers and often winning with them...
For your question I bet you that many will come from there....
:agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
Re: thoughts

Maggie said:
Not long ago somebody mentioned something about going back in draws by the 100's. This got me curious and this is what I've come up with, starting with last night's draw. (1965)

1865- no matches
1765- 13-41-42 -45-46-49
1665- 3-12-22-35-40-47
1565- 1-10-16-38 -44-45
1465- 10-16-28-37-42-47
1365- 9-21 -25-27-40-42
1265- 2-9-17-25-30-40
1165- 3-9-16-19-32 -47

Here you have all the numbers from last night except the 29. The bonus 47 came up 3 times.

So, I'm thinking if you go back 100 each time starting with Sat. draw which will be 1966, will there be 5 or more from that bunch.
You have the 47 also.

D'oh, you have that :blush:
 
Last edited:
Top