Discussion for June 21-649

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 03 04 05 06 07
09 12 13 17 18 20
21 22 24 25 26 28
29 32 33 35 38 39
40 43 44 45 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(4 were here, in the last draw) :eek:
02 08 10 11 14 15
16 19 23 27 30 31
34 36 37 41 42 46
47


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 335
3 and 3: 263
5 and 1: 237
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 052
1 and 5: 023
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

ox

Member
HI GEORGE,

DO YOU ALSO APPLY YOUR PROGRAM FOR ONT49
I JUST NOTICED THAT 5 NOS. FROM YOUR JUNE 18
POPPED OUT(RESULT:07 10 22 36 39 43 BONUS 6)


:) ox :)
 

gsobier

Member
Ox:

I'd have to run against the Ont49. This report is intimate with the Can 6/49 only. I need to get all the Ont49 data to do that report.

I hope to report on Super 7 this way too when I get a chance to spend time on it.

Regards,
George:)

ox said:
HI GEORGE,

DO YOU ALSO APPLY YOUR PROGRAM FOR ONT49
I JUST NOTICED THAT 5 NOS. FROM YOUR JUNE 18
POPPED OUT(RESULT:07 10 22 36 39 43 BONUS 6)


:) ox :)
 

Beaker

Member
Picard said:
Told you all the 29 would show. :D

Good luck for the next draw! :wavey:


Make it so. :scatter:
This one is hot and I'm still expecting a 4peat coming.

This one might be on deck :eek:
 

Beaker

Member
mon said:
WE MAY SEE 1 OR 5 THIS DRAW
:)
Many hits for that 5 and it will be hard not to play it but it is at the top of the list for double announcers and high for triple. I'll pass - been :burnt: too many times thinking those numbers will come.

See if anything else changes my mind :read:
 

Beaker

Member
George, I think this one goes high - starting in the 20's - the only thing that causes me to think about this a bit more is all the 1's you have in your 30's list :eek:

There are many many examples of that 1 announcing high draws and in particular that 3 high draw-miss a few- hit a 1- then a high. Also, that LD 1 is a good announcer for high.

BUT, my good good set might be in play here and that one has 2 low ones. :eek:

Remember the 49-calls-1 1-calls-49 rule, that one hit nicely now we have to watch the comeback 49 is hanging nicely :clown:
 

gsobier

Member
Beaker:

WOW, there are lots of eyes lookin' at my list... ...makes me feel good to know it is appreciated:agree:. Well, knowing the first number is key just like the last number. Just like Dennis says, got some stuff and need the rest for some good sandwiches:agree:. I wonder what Dennis is up to these days... ...its nice and interesting to read his posts. I guess we will have to do our best for the time being.

I'm not going to pretend to understand so I'm asking... ...I don't follow the comment of all the 1's in my 30 list:notme:. Is it decade 10?

Regards,
George:)

Beaker said:
George, I think this one goes high - starting in the 20's - the only thing that causes me to think about this a bit more is all the 1's you have in your 30's list :eek:

There are many many examples of that 1 announcing high draws and in particular that 3 high draw-miss a few- hit a 1- then a high. Also, that LD 1 is a good announcer for high.

BUT, my good good set might be in play here and that one has 2 low ones. :eek:

Remember the 49-calls-1 1-calls-49 rule, that one hit nicely now we have to watch the comeback 49 is hanging nicely :clown:
 

Beaker

Member
George, I guess it takes another pair of eyes to see something in the data :lol:

When I look at your 30-19 for this draw I see

30 - 01 03 04 05 06 07 09
19 - 02 08

If I think all high is going to hit, I may have a problem. :agree: because you're calling low in your lists :agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
Beaker:

There have been some changes which I can't explain. Do you think Dennis would explain a we had a "shift in the draw". We just had a [2 and 4] so it might go [0 and 6] or [1 and 5]. I've seen it bounce back too and then go [2 and 4] again, so its not for sure:notme:.

I've learn alot since joining this forum and a revision to 30-19 might be possible to make it more reliable. I got some ideas and I'll try it out in regression testing.

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
George, I guess it takes another pair of eyes to see something in the data :lol:

When I look at your 30-19 for this draw I see

30 - 01 03 04 05 06 07 09
19 - 02 08

If I think all high is going to hit, I may have a problem. :agree: because you're calling low in your lists :agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
Well, definitely we are in a shift in the draws - no question and I know Dennis would agree.

We may see the begining of the Tsunami - last draw was very calm :dizzy:

George, when the draws go 2-4 or 1-5 in your lists what does the next one look like? Do you track that?
 

gsobier

Member
Beaker:

Tsunami? I'll have to look that one up:eek::bawl:.

We could have another one within 5 or 6. I've seen a consecutive bunch of [2 and4]s before. The last time we had less than [3 and 3] was a [2 and 4] on 23-Apr-2003 Draw# 2009 and then it was a [5 and 1] the following draw. Was there a shift in the draws for 2009?

On 15-Feb-2003 (#1981) we had a [2 and 4]. Following that, we had [4 and 2], [2 and 4], [3 and 3], [1 and 5], [3 and 3], [3 and 3], [5 and 1], and then [6 and 0]. What was going on around the time of #1981 is what I'm interested in Sire:agree:.

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
Well, definitely we are in a shift in the draws - no question and I know Dennis would agree.

We may see the begining of the Tsunami - last draw was very calm :dizzy:

George, when the draws go 2-4 or 1-5 in your lists what does the next one look like? Do you track that?
 

biz2000

Member
about 1 leads to 49

Hi! guys:

I checked past 50 draws. Seems only once that when 1 was drawn, 49 will come up in the next draw...

anyone want to give any advice on whether we will see any repeat # from previous draw?


biz2000
 
Top