digits 49/6

jack

Member
greater difficulty of players and gamblers DA49 / 6 is choosing the numbers
To facilitate this arduous task present , firsthand , the results of my research and analysis .

The choice should not be taken upon itself numbers , because the numbers are simply identifiers that could be letters or colors or name of fruit etc , but must be made upon the condition that is the number before the draw .

The rationale shows that the number should be segmented into its digits ( digit number and the unit digit) . Statistically it does not interfere in the process and opening a second range of details , which can now analyze the conditions of the digits .

What are these " conditions " and some of his behavior is to be presented .

The following table shows the percentage of occurrence of each digit in each column obtained from actual results of 1400 49/6 . The sets are not in order of the draw and not shown in the official result , but ordered among themselves .

*************************************************************

The percentages in increasing order in columns 1 , 2 and 3 are equal to declining orders in columns 6 , 5 ​​and 4, respectively , ie the digit zero in P1 is equally likely that the digit 9 in P6 , and so with all other

The percentages in increasing order of the digits 0 , 1, 2 , 3 and 4 are equal to the decreasing order of the digits 9, 8 , 7, 6:05 , respectively. For example, the percentage of the digit 4 columns P1, P2 , P3 .... is the same as the percentage of the digit 5 in columns P6, P5 , P4 .....

Drawing a vertical line between P3 and P4 and a horizontal line through the digits 4:05 four quadrants formed which facilitates visibility of equidistance .

This remarkable distribution allows immediately conclude that :

1 ) random draws does not mean total disorganization, but rather there is a logical structure in the organization .

2 ) Plagiarizing ( and against ) a known cliché , " the cookie has memory yes" , this organization is sufficient proof .

3 ) All the digits are equally likely only when NOT SEE HER POSITION inside the drawn together ( and orderly ) . By positioning them the odds change.

Thus the combination 01 02 03 04 05 06 can be drawn , after all it 's in the game , but its probability is not equal to the others.

In the sweepstakes , each column of digits promotes ballet and choreography closely follows the Domino Theory Effect . Analyze one digit alone is meaningless because it depends on your position and the other in the set. The selection MUST be made by sets of digits .
This is in contrast to another famous cliché , "the past does interfere in this "

Having selected sets of digits number of digits and units they are crossed among themselves born combinations of tens .
Note that the scores will not emerging one by one , but they already appear in combinations ready .

As the digits , the numbers are also subject to the conditions and combinations must pass through this sieve .

It's the best ( and perhaps only) way to make a play directed by TREND because now it is real , visible and quantifiable .
 

Icewynd

Member
Hi Jack,

Nice to see you posting again.

jack said:
greater difficulty of players and gamblers DA49 / 6 is choosing the numbers

Too true!

jack said:
To facilitate this arduous task present , firsthand , the results of my research and analysis .

Thanks for sharing.

jack said:
The choice should not be taken upon itself numbers , because the numbers are simply identifiers that could be letters or colors or name of fruit etc , but must be made upon the condition that is the number before the draw .

The rationale shows that the number should be segmented into its digits ( digit number and the unit digit) . Statistically it does not interfere in the process and opening a second range of details , which can now analyze the conditions of the digits .

OK, so we break each number into its digits, i.e. 1=0 1, 43=4 3

jack said:
The following table shows the percentage of occurrence of each digit in each column obtained from actual results of 1400 49/6 . The sets are not in order of the draw and not shown in the official result , but ordered among themselves .

I couldn't see a table, but I followed your instructions (I think) to make my own:

I put the file up on MediaFire as it is so difficult to post tables here:

https://www.mediafire.com/?99178dmwe6v4t0z
*************************************************************

jack said:
1 ) random draws does not mean total disorganization, but rather there is a logical structure in the organization .

Yes, this way of looking at the numbers helps to see that there is a pattern.

jack said:
3 ) All the digits are equally likely only when NOT SEE HER POSITION inside the drawn together ( and orderly ) . By positioning them the odds change.

Thus the combination 01 02 03 04 05 06 can be drawn , after all it 's in the game , but its probability is not equal to the others.

Not sure I buy your argument that the odds change, the odds are still the odds and 1-2-3-4-5-6 has an equal probability of being drawn as 5-14-27-32-49, with extremely high odds against either.

jack said:
In the sweepstakes , each column of digits promotes ballet and choreography closely follows the Domino Theory Effect . Analyze one digit alone is meaningless because it depends on your position and the other in the set. As the digits , the numbers are also subject to the conditions and combinations must pass through this sieve .

It's the best ( and perhaps only) way to make a play directed by TREND because now it is real , visible and quantifiable .

So, are you saying to use the table to select P2-P6 based on what you think P1 will be? Unless I am missing something, the table just shows what is most probable in any position but doesn't give us any information about how the 6 numbers in any given draw are related. That is, given my last drawn numbers of 3-29-30-35-46-49 (48) I can see that P2 and P3 are higher than average for those positions and will likely come down -- is this what you mean?

Good luck!

:thumb:
 

jack

Member
Hello ice , I'll talk about the sweet maybe you can help me out here ok =
Methodological research in one of the first things is to segment , shared understanding of the parties because it is easier than the whole. It is easier to find a problem in rice and beans analyzing rice and beans separately. The same thing goes for the lottery is easier to analyze than tens digit and unit digit of the decade .

Let's put numbers . Separating the digits I create 2 lotteries :
- With 6 digits and participants are drawn 6 and may be repeated
- Other participants with 10 digits and 6 are also drawn . may be repeated .

Compare now with 60 being drawn tens 6 without repetition . Which is easier ?
Further , using four digits for different DD ( tens digit ) and DU five different digit ( digit unit) which is the configuration that has the highest percentage of events has been dozens 20 , which is a multiplication of 4 of 5 DD DU .

Now 's a question for everyone that deal with dozens and matrices and developments and closings and warranties and all those things which I am layman ns :
- How many combinations you need using these 20 scores to ensure sena in more than 50 % of the time ( in real situations that have occurred so far and not speculation ) ?

DD chose to casually set : 122334 and DU : 006 789

My system in pure assembly ( no filter) 78 combinations . It is a good number or not ?

1 10 20 26 37 38 49
2 10 20 26 37 39 48
3 10 20 26 38 39 47
4 10 20 27 36 38 49
5 10 20 27 36 39 48
6 10 20 27 38 39 46
7 10 20 28 36 37 49
8 10 20 28 36 39 47
9 10 20 28 37 39 46
10 10 20 29 36 37 48
11 10 20 29 36 38 47
12 10 20 29 37 38 46
13 10 26 27 30 38 49
14 10 26 27 30 39 48
15 10 26 27 38 39 40
16 10 26 28 30 37 49
17 10 26 28 30 39 47
18 10 26 28 37 39 40
19 10 26 29 30 37 48
20 10 26 29 30 38 47
21 10 26 29 37 38 40
22 10 27 28 30 36 49
23 10 27 28 30 39 46
24 10 27 28 36 39 40
25 10 27 29 30 36 48
26 10 27 29 30 38 46
27 10 27 29 36 38 40
28 10 28 29 30 36 47
29 10 28 29 30 37 46
30 10 28 29 36 37 40
31 16 20 27 30 38 49
32 16 20 27 30 39 48
33 16 20 27 38 39 40
34 16 20 28 30 37 49
35 16 20 28 30 39 47
36 16 20 28 37 39 40
37 16 20 29 30 37 48
38 16 20 29 30 38 47
39 16 20 29 37 38 40
40 16 27 28 30 39 40
41 16 27 29 30 38 40
42 16 28 29 30 37 40
43 17 20 26 30 38 49
44 17 20 26 30 39 48
45 17 20 26 38 39 40
46 17 20 28 30 36 49
47 17 20 28 30 39 46
48 17 20 28 36 39 40
49 17 20 29 30 36 48
50 17 20 29 30 38 46
51 17 20 29 36 38 40
52 17 26 28 30 39 40
53 17 26 29 30 38 40
54 17 28 29 30 36 40
55 18 20 26 30 37 49
56 18 20 26 30 39 47
57 18 20 26 37 39 40
58 18 20 27 30 36 49
59 18 20 27 30 39 46
60 18 20 27 36 39 40
61 18 20 29 30 36 47
62 18 20 29 30 37 46
63 18 20 29 36 37 40
64 18 26 27 30 39 40
65 18 26 29 30 37 40
66 18 27 29 30 36 40
67 19 20 26 30 37 48
68 19 20 26 30 38 47
69 19 20 26 37 38 40
70 19 20 27 30 36 48
71 19 20 27 30 38 46
72 19 20 27 36 38 40
73 19 20 28 30 36 47
74 19 20 28 30 37 46
75 19 20 28 36 37 40
76 19 26 27 30 38 40
77 19 26 28 30 37 40
78 19 27 28 30 36 40

I think this more than proves that mounting agree digit is more efficient ?

But the best is yet to come ....

How to choose tens ? ?
Birthday ?
Board crashed car ?
etc , etc , etc.

Never mind , they all are but " hunches " and most of the time is like music " unfortunate hunch " he says.

Until recently the criteria I used to select digits were :
- Matrix crossover Frequency and Delay
- . Charts These 2 criteria compared to the criteria that will be used from now on are very weak .

The new criteria you literally see where the digits moved and can design the route . So I called RADAR to this model.

There is a diametrical divergence from your philosophy and most that use arrays :
the goal is to " win" and not " do not miss" .
This difference may seem insignificant but it is critical , because you can not point to " more or less" for the trend .

I know clearly that the fatal question is still not answered :
"How do I choose the digits ? "

First, as already mentioned , does not choose digits, but sets of digits .
According talked domino effect , where one drags the other
Third spoke a Ballet , where there is harmony
Room Table I presented . It shows the Relative Frequency REAL by position .
Fifth , ah missed the picture is not ?

Go to list of photos and see " Choosing the tens of Lotofacil " does not refer to the digits of Mega but the concept is the same .

Think of to get a better idea of how to choose the sets of digits of Mega .

Now answering some of your questions and questioning .

If you " cut " the tips you lose the two biggest references of the movement .

Suggestion : Forget the numbers ,
Ice the term dozens numbers mean ok
*The above study is the mega sena
60/6
*table
P1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 positon
0=digit
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
 

jack

Member
Hello, conglatulaçoes ice, very good job on the table, you noticed
* That at position 3.4 4.5 digits, seek balance, from the center
* It's similar in nature, the search for balance of course is to separate the digits in ascending number to be analyzed after the crossing the order digit can go in 1st position
* 09. then ice, you can analyze the previous draws, and each position in the vertical
Starting from the center (position 3.4) with 4.5 digits, is where is the union of 4 quandrante
* Some more filtroas for decades or lines, eg in line 01-10 if the last digit was 6.9
* ent
then crossing the 06.09 is just par show the power of the last digit as filters with decades of crossing numbers
 

Sidebar

Top