DEC 7 Provincial 6/49's
- Thread starter daleks
- Start date
am viewing 3 graphs: A) #'s drawn from beginning (1132 draws)
B) from beginning plus bonus (1132 draws)
C) #'s drawn this year (96 draws).
noticed this: graph A is gradual, not many #'s drawn same number of times. grouping in last three draws was around #'s drawn 137-140 times;
graph B gradual also, grouping of #'s drawn in last 3 is spread out;
graph C is blocky ie - 9 #'s drawn 10 times
6 #'s drawn 11 times
5 #'s drawn 14 times
4 #'s drawn 15 times
the grouping of #'s drawn in last 3 is spread out.
I don't know what any of this means and might never know, but have also noticed this: of the 15 #'s drawn most often in the last 96 draws (those #'s drawn 17,16,15,14 times), only 2 show up in the grouping on chart A.
There seems to be a trend of #'s pushing their way to the top, but, more importantly, because there are 13 million combinations,and only 1132 have been chosen, the larger trend to equalize is past our even bothering to look at. It might be safe to stay with the inherent bias programmed into the game, and stay with the leading numbers.
B) from beginning plus bonus (1132 draws)
C) #'s drawn this year (96 draws).
noticed this: graph A is gradual, not many #'s drawn same number of times. grouping in last three draws was around #'s drawn 137-140 times;
graph B gradual also, grouping of #'s drawn in last 3 is spread out;
graph C is blocky ie - 9 #'s drawn 10 times
6 #'s drawn 11 times
5 #'s drawn 14 times
4 #'s drawn 15 times
the grouping of #'s drawn in last 3 is spread out.
I don't know what any of this means and might never know, but have also noticed this: of the 15 #'s drawn most often in the last 96 draws (those #'s drawn 17,16,15,14 times), only 2 show up in the grouping on chart A.
There seems to be a trend of #'s pushing their way to the top, but, more importantly, because there are 13 million combinations,and only 1132 have been chosen, the larger trend to equalize is past our even bothering to look at. It might be safe to stay with the inherent bias programmed into the game, and stay with the leading numbers.
Last edited:
Hi, my name is peter, and i am an...lotto guy
and, this is true:since signing on here a little while back, my numbers have gone to sh.t.....for some years prior, without paying attention to really what was happening with numbers every draw, i was playing something i thought was warm and cozy.....i could not "beat" the numbers - ie, get lots of right numbers each draw, but by playing consistently in some sort of system, did make a few dollars.....
tha range of systems to play with is probably bigger than the odds of winning the jackpot in the first place...and, i have come out of my stupor........
reference: LT's desire to stay with the same set of numbers over a period of time, and, today, BRAD, an honest wilderness person ( i don't know what that means) discovered - in another forum on this site - that HE HAD LOST IT COMPLETELY - reference - see the daily postings, i think ( hey, brad, how u doing) --- AND WE HAVE ALL BEEN THERE----and i have had the same thing happen to me as happened to brad--------------so, here is my solution:
for the next little while, i will do what i have done in the past, and let the numbers come to me....i will play all LD's 5 or less, throw in the occasional 6,7 or 8,,,,,and stay away from the 40's........
no more graphs and/or charts....no more groups, blah, blah, blah........will certainly never go to quick picks, but will let my instincts take over.............
now, i will sit down,,,,,,,,and drink more coffee.....hey, that's my donoughtn ...donot.... dounot....doughnout....got it...........
and, this is true:since signing on here a little while back, my numbers have gone to sh.t.....for some years prior, without paying attention to really what was happening with numbers every draw, i was playing something i thought was warm and cozy.....i could not "beat" the numbers - ie, get lots of right numbers each draw, but by playing consistently in some sort of system, did make a few dollars.....
tha range of systems to play with is probably bigger than the odds of winning the jackpot in the first place...and, i have come out of my stupor........
reference: LT's desire to stay with the same set of numbers over a period of time, and, today, BRAD, an honest wilderness person ( i don't know what that means) discovered - in another forum on this site - that HE HAD LOST IT COMPLETELY - reference - see the daily postings, i think ( hey, brad, how u doing) --- AND WE HAVE ALL BEEN THERE----and i have had the same thing happen to me as happened to brad--------------so, here is my solution:
for the next little while, i will do what i have done in the past, and let the numbers come to me....i will play all LD's 5 or less, throw in the occasional 6,7 or 8,,,,,and stay away from the 40's........
no more graphs and/or charts....no more groups, blah, blah, blah........will certainly never go to quick picks, but will let my instincts take over.............
now, i will sit down,,,,,,,,and drink more coffee.....hey, that's my donoughtn ...donot.... dounot....doughnout....got it...........
Brad
Member
Welcome to the Sweet Section
First we had Cookies for Combo now it's Donuts for Daleks
PS you're right about my temporary insanity (at least I think it won't last) as I for the briefest of moments thought I could have my cake and eat it too ... guess I'll have to settle for the occasional Brownie
Hey, we have to come up with a sweet for Mon !!
First we had Cookies for Combo now it's Donuts for Daleks
PS you're right about my temporary insanity (at least I think it won't last) as I for the briefest of moments thought I could have my cake and eat it too ... guess I'll have to settle for the occasional Brownie
Hey, we have to come up with a sweet for Mon !!
Re: Welcome to the Sweet Section
To summarize it, THE SWEET BC49NERS
Brownie Brad
Cookie Combo
Doughnut Daleks
Need more coffee or tea?
You sweet guys have all the fun!
Brad said:First we had Cookies for Combo now it's Donuts for Daleks
PS you're right about my temporary insanity (at least I think it won't last) as I for the briefest of moments thought I could have my cake and eat it too ... guess I'll have to settle for the occasional Brownie
Hey, we have to come up with a sweet for Mon !!
To summarize it, THE SWEET BC49NERS
Brownie Brad
Cookie Combo
Doughnut Daleks
Need more coffee or tea?
You sweet guys have all the fun!
these are serious numbers
played usual 80 boards; 20 each starting with 2,4,6 or 12, then:
played at random below LD's 6, paying attention to 32 34,35...20,30,40...13,23,43....threw in 38,39/47,48,49......hee haw
one quick pick double play BC/49 and 6/49....19,23,25,37,46,48.......
good luck to all....
played usual 80 boards; 20 each starting with 2,4,6 or 12, then:
played at random below LD's 6, paying attention to 32 34,35...20,30,40...13,23,43....threw in 38,39/47,48,49......hee haw
one quick pick double play BC/49 and 6/49....19,23,25,37,46,48.......
good luck to all....
ComboManiac
Member
Daleks might have scored
With those crazy high numbers I suspect Daleks matched 3 ot 4/6
But I can't believe they picked everything that Brad OON !!
32-35-39
With those crazy high numbers I suspect Daleks matched 3 ot 4/6
But I can't believe they picked everything that Brad OON !!
32-35-39
Brad
Member
Re: these are serious numbers
Re: OONs ... I should'a waited till 4:55 to post
That's 4 and the bonusdaleks said:played usual 80 boards; 20 each starting with 2,4,6 or 12, then:
played at random below LD's 6, paying attention to 32 34,35...20,30,40 ...13,23,43....threw in 38,39 /47,48,49......hee haw
<snip>....
Re: OONs ... I should'a waited till 4:55 to post
Last edited:
ComboManiac
Member
BC/49 SUCKS BIG TIME
I think we should play the way Daleks does as it's much better than ours IF THERE IS MONEY FOR THAT.
The Day of Reckoning is Dec 28 and hoping by then LUCK would change even to match 3/10
I think we should play the way Daleks does as it's much better than ours IF THERE IS MONEY FOR THAT.
The Day of Reckoning is Dec 28 and hoping by then LUCK would change even to match 3/10
how sweet it is....
" doughnut " ?.......this is what happened...the 35 was on all boards, winning 3 4+ bonus, and 6 3+bonus....lots of 2 + bonus....no 28, i did not play that and quite a few 21's, helping with the winning combinations in two boards.....the first number drawn was again an odd number, and i played a few 11's as well, noting Brad's post that it had come up to the 35 number level....40 i played a lot and 38, but no 28 or 8........the 32 played a large role, and was in all but two of the winning combinations, and lots of other lines.........i think it helped the numbers started at 21, and i hardly play them so close together ie - 32,35,38,39,40 - although that happens quite often especially with LD's below 6, that the 5 or 5+ will continue to elude.....must make changes.......
sweets things to all....
" doughnut " ?.......this is what happened...the 35 was on all boards, winning 3 4+ bonus, and 6 3+bonus....lots of 2 + bonus....no 28, i did not play that and quite a few 21's, helping with the winning combinations in two boards.....the first number drawn was again an odd number, and i played a few 11's as well, noting Brad's post that it had come up to the 35 number level....40 i played a lot and 38, but no 28 or 8........the 32 played a large role, and was in all but two of the winning combinations, and lots of other lines.........i think it helped the numbers started at 21, and i hardly play them so close together ie - 32,35,38,39,40 - although that happens quite often especially with LD's below 6, that the 5 or 5+ will continue to elude.....must make changes.......
sweets things to all....
Last edited:
ComboManiac
Member
Winning $90.00 and Losing $40.00
Well Done Daleks
At least you got $50.00 extra
Keep it up so that you can catch 5/6 off guard
Well Done Daleks
At least you got $50.00 extra
Keep it up so that you can catch 5/6 off guard