computing 39 numbers out of 49

[northlight]

Hi everyone, I made my program that can compute 39 numbers out of 49 numbers, the accuracy is 92%, mean 100 times, 92 times are correct, also means if you pick numbers from those 10 numbers not in the list, then you are wasting money.

But I do not use it often, because it is still too much. If any of you have other methods that can shrink numbers, then we can share two sets, and only buy those in common, make it to be 25 numbers or even less.

let me know.

 

[GillesD]

39 out of 49 numbers

... I made my program that can compute 39 numbers out of 49 numbers, the accuracy is 92%, ...

Interesting but how do you define accuracy?
- Do you get all 6 winning numbers in your 39 numbers 92% of the times?
- Or do you get at least 3 winning numbers in your 39 numbers 92% of the times?

There is quite a difference between the two. And with 39 numbers, you can generate 3,262,623 combinations or roughly 23.3% of all combination in a 6/49 lottery.

 

[ferrabi]

hi gilles d
thats a good question and those were my thoughts.

i have a question for you, no matter which numbers you remove from the 49, or how many, as a matter of fact any system so far that i have seen doesnt' improve the odds. the odds never seem to improve over the long run, i remember you checked out my system before. and i have been studying it, which kinda shows that random is always random, and nothing influences it. i was just wondering if you have come across a system that even improves the odds by more then 2% in the long run?

 

[Nick Koutras]

Hi all,

I think he is talking about the Best Performing Set.

For example the BPS for the CAN-649 with 39 numbers is the following:

010203040507091315161719202123252627282930313233343637383940414243444546474849


with the following hits for 4,5,&6 hits

697 1020 609 out of the 2480 draws using the 6 main numbers,

which gives us 94% 4 or more out of the 6.

 

[ferrabi]

makes sense nick

but lets see what the actual method is. hopefuly he wil answer

 

[tomtom]

39 numbers?

Can someone enlighten me, since I really have a hard time understanding purpose of having or chasing 39 numbers…to be honest if I had something that is much harder to experience, like a sure 5 numbers among 20 , wouldn’t play unless a game is really good deal regarding ticket prices and prizes, so at the end at least wouldn't lose some really very high amounts of money if played some more tickets..

So, what’s the big deal with having 6 among 39 numbers?

 

[tomtom]

39 numbers?

Can someone enlighten me, since I really have a hard time understanding purpose of having or chasing 39 numbers…to be honest if I had something that is much harder to experience, like a sure 5 numbers among 20 , wouldn’t play unless a game is really good deal regarding ticket prices and prizes, so at the end at least wouldn't lose some really very high amounts of money if played some more tickets..

So, what’s the big deal with having 6 among 39 numbers?

And, sure..no one could have a sure 6 out of 39 in a higher than 39 numbers lottery, same as no one could have something even much harder to get like sure 5 out of 20 or out of 30...

still, just a simple question, what’s the big deal in having 6 among 39 ?

 

[CalifDude]

Hi everyone, I made my program that can compute 39 numbers out of 49 numbers, the accuracy is 92%, mean 100 times, 92 times are correct, also means if you pick numbers from those 10 numbers not in the list, then you are wasting money.

But I do not use it often, because it is still too much. If any of you have other methods that can shrink numbers, then we can share two sets, and only buy those in common, make it to be 25 numbers or even less.

let me know.

Here are you choices (take them or leave them!) for a Pick 6 using 39 numbers:

3of3 = 642 tickets
3of4 = 308
3of5 = 121
3of6 = 93
4of5 = 2,681
4of6 = 1,615

You can only count on the guarantee.

CalifDude

 

[northlight]

thanks for reply everyone. I need to explain it more, my program will compute 32-39 number from 49 numbers, at 92 of 100 times(50weeks), all 6 numbers + 1 bonus number are all inside 32-39 numbers, that it is.

it is still hard to go any further step, I know what you say, it is still big, of course, it should be big, otherwise I will be richest man in the world, right?

That is what I got, I am looking for someone has similar progress, then it is worth to post it here and combine two set together to make it like 25 numbers, it might not always include 6 numbers, but worth to keep buying. Now my program running need 12 hours on a P4 computer, I am lazy to run it every time.

 

[harrywienerman]

Well Mr Northern light I think you should show a leap of good faith and post your 32-39 numbers here for the 35 million. One time, make us all believers in your system

 

[ferrabi]

hey northernlight

if your system does work about 92 percent of the time in predicting 6+B, with the 32-39 numbers then i would say congradulation, because thats kind of a big deal. because you would have improved your odds significantly, though this maybe only a small step in winning the lottery. but i think its a giant leap towards if it works, would love to know more details in it.

good job

 

[johnph77]

Programming hint - there are as many combinations in 10/49 as there are in 39/49 - 8,217,822,536.

 

[northlight]

This time is harder, so it should be 5-6 numbers inside following 30 numbers:
21
19
31
37
42
1
4
29
5
3
15
18
2
7
28
34
14
27
44
39
12
49
41
10
22
38
24
9
40
33

further, most possible, the number from 30 to 39 will not show this time, so a reduced set is:
1
2
3
4
5
7
9
10
12
14
15
18
19
21
22
24
27
28
29
40
41
42
44
49

good luck!

 

[northlight]

This time is harder, so it should be 5-6 numbers inside following 30 numbers:
21
19
31
37
42
1
4
29
5
3
15
18
2
7
28
34
14
27
44
39
12
49
41
10
22
38
24
9
40
33

further, most possible, the number from 30 to 39 will not show this time, so a reduced set is:
1
2
3
4
5
7
9
10
12
14
15
18
19
21
22
24
27
28
29
40
41
42
44
49

good luck!

Due to evertime different existing pattern, the result can be different, so this time is only 30 numbers, less numbers than 39# at less accuracy, so this time is 4 numbers out of 30, after reduced set, is 4 numbers out of 24 numbers.

it fail into the 8%. Hope next times pattern is nice and I can get 6-7# out of 39#. will post later.