Yes it is too early for me too...but these two numbers are already on my list too...The 08, the 12 and the 18 also 31 are also top ones on my list now...Florie said:For a start, possible DNs in my list would be 5 and 45 unless I found a better one. We'll wait and see. Still too early to finalize.
To complete the picture here thanks Peter for these!peter said:To date we have had 3383 LD pairs.
LD 1...359
LD 2...365
LD 3...360
LD 4...358
LD 5...352
LD 6...358
LD 7...376
LD 8...312
LD 9...331
LD 0...212
Most popular, 25/45...47 times
Least popular, 11/21...22 times
Oldest, 8/38, draw 1708.
I have been doing it and I think that Beaker has been doing it too...Perhaps I should make the countdown of all these matrix individually..peter said:Dennis, with your announcer theory, have you ever looked at what is announced the next draw, if a certain LD PAIR shows up the draw before?
For example, what happens when the 1/11 show up, or 1/21, this could be done for all 96 LD pairs. Just a thought!, perhaps you are doing this currently, if not, its a new idea to think about.
To expand on that you could look at what is annonced by consecutives too!
I look at announcers for all 21 pairs from the last draw - not just LD's I haven't looked at LD's specifically but couldDennis Bassboss said:I have been doing it and I think that Beaker have been doing it too...Perhaps I should make the countdown of all these matrix individually..
But for each draw the double announcer grids takes care of these..
Consecutives as well.Beaker said:I look at announcers for all 21 pairs from the last draw - not just LD's I haven't looked at LD's specifically but could
This is what I am doing too!So in a way we are looking at it but not on an individual bases so to speak!Beaker said:I look at announcers for all 21 pairs from the last draw - not just LD's I haven't looked at LD's specifically but could
Same data 2 different perspectives Maybe we need our eyes checkedDennis Bassboss said:This is what I am doing too!So in a way we are looking at it but not on an individual bases so to speak!
Your absouloutly Right!!! yes same data just a little different way of looking at it.Beaker said:Same data 2 different perspectives Maybe we need our eyes checked
And I'm still looking strongly at 28-45 and 34-47...peter said:Sure was an old pair last night in 6/35, last coming in draw 1745, 265 draws ago, some 2 1/2 years ago.