Analysing the digits in your Lotto

[Icewynd]

One way of looking at the lotto numbers that I have been using lately is to break the numbers out into their digits -- for example "14" is composed of the digits 1 and 4. If you do this, you will immediately notice that there are a lot of 1s, 2s, 3s & 4s -- in fact, there are 14 of each of these digits (I call them the base set) as compared to 5 of each digit 5 to 9 and only 4 zeros. (These numbers are for a 49 number lotto, obviously they will be different for lottos with a different set of numbers).

An average lotto draw will have 11 different digits with 7 coming from the 1-4 group and 4 coming from the other digits. The neat thing about this is that, in about 50% of the draws, one of the base digits is missing. So, if you feel that the 4's might be missing in the next draw, that allows you to drop not only the entire 40's decade, but also 4, 14, 24 and 34. You can combine decade anlysis with last digit analysis to help you determine which of the 'base' digits might not appear.

 

[CMF]

Ruminations on Expectations

One way of looking at the lotto numbers that I have been using lately is to break the numbers out into their digits -- for example "14" is composed of the digits 1 and 4. If you do this, you will immediately notice that there are a lot of 1s, 2s, 3s & 4s -- in fact, there are 14 of each of these digits (I call them the base set) as compared to 5 of each digit 5 to 9 and only 4 zeros. (These numbers are for a 49 number lotto, obviously they will be different for lottos with a different set of numbers).

An average lotto draw will have 11 different digits with 7 coming from the 1-4 group and 4 coming from the other digits. The neat thing about this is that, in about 50% of the draws, one of the base digits is missing. So, if you feel that the 4's might be missing in the next draw, that allows you to drop not only the entire 40's decade, but also 4, 14, 24 and 34. You can combine decade anlysis with last digit analysis to help you determine which of the 'base' digits might not appear.

So, show us where you have seen this working in your favor for actual Lotto draws and not being entirely random as expected. You should be looking for consistency in supporting what you have dreamed up. You have done this?

Colin

 

[jaakinye]

Hello,
Big news for all loto players
This program analyse all aspect of digit(28 occations)
I have a coplex program that generates combinations on the basis of past records.
The program consists of 3 steps:
1. Analysing records after new combination input
3. Condition formation and
3. Generation of combiations with or without your own numbers
The program generates number of balls according to your wishes.
For example the porgram can generate the first,second etc in a combinatio..
This is for player bettig with 1,2,3 or 4 numvers.The program can generate any part of combination.
You can bet on the fist and the fifth number,or second anthe third number etc
What I need is which loto you are playing and at least the last 500 past records one after another.
Test me.

 

[CMF]

Testing the Lotto Braggarts

There are plenty of Pick 6, Pool 49 Lotto games around the world. It is your contention that by examining the recent history of draws for a particular Lotto game which in reality is just a sequence of random selections that the following draw can be predicted to some extent.

You should have no problem then in providing us with some samples from existing draws where there is some consistency between a combination drawn and the previous draws. Don't forget to be meaningful and useful the consistency must exceed that expected by probability calculations and all the testing I've done points toward those who use prior history for calculations as achieving less than or at the most equivalent to the odds.

ANALYSIS OF LOTTO DRAW HISTORY - THE FINAL WORD
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=638&FID=46&PR=3

Colin Fairbrother