After the Feb 26th draw

Beaker

Member
I would look very closely at our WinHunter - and other - calls...take a look..
Originally posted by ComboManiac
Beaker,

you requested me to post future predictions...Here they are :

WH 0.14

01-05-07-09-17-26-26-35-41-44-45

another one : 01-05-09-17-22-26-28-30-35-37-41-44-45-49


WH 3.18

01-05-06-07-14-24-26-28-29-34 !!!

another one : 06-07-08-12-14-24-26-29-34 !!!

Sample Stack provided by Andrew :

04-05-06-09-11-15-17-25-26-28-30-32-36-38-41-44-45 too many !!

Take your pick and let's watch....Or maybe you ppl play them

Now this one started the :party: - for those who who came late, this one above called 7/16 a few draws back...who else was at the party..
Beaker said:
OK, for all the WinHunter fans, ComboM was kind enough to post his 0.14 runs, I'll post this contribution from WH 0.4.0

Set 1 - 1-5 from this:
1-5-8-11-12-14-24-26-28-29-34-36-47

Set 2 - 0-2 from this:
10-19-20-31-33-42-43-48

I just want to add, cuz it hit me....

Beaker said:
Play some from that 1st set for sure. :agree2: It's a good looking set :agree2: Lot's of :dance1: :lol: ;)


I wouldn't look too far from all of these WinHunter sets :no: I really like the look of ComboM's runs.

Notice that 1-5 :worry:

:clown: :clown:
 
Last edited:

Randal

Member
Ok seriously, who cares? Two numbers...

Anyway I'm glad the 649 was carried over because I'm not buying an excess amount of quickpicks until it's up to $10 million again!

LONG LIVE CARRY OVERS!
 

Beaker

Member
Randal said:
Ok seriously, who cares? Two numbers...

Anyway I'm glad the 649 was carried over because I'm not buying an excess amount of quickpicks until it's up to $10 million again!

LONG LIVE CARRY OVERS!
You Freak :finger:

01-05-06-07-14-24-26-28-29-34

this gem, played right, paid $600++, a few .01 more than your allowance.

Now, be a good boy and go play.:baby:
 
Last edited:
First I want to congratulate all the winners from yesterday! Good show numbrsdudes:agree2:

gene1956 said:
Heavy Hitters

1, 18, 22, 33

:smash: :smash: :smash:

Also 25 not dead yet

I'd say that this was awesome.....Could have played the 5 numbers 44$ tickets here... :clown: :agree2:
 
And very awesome results from Winhunter this time around.... :agree2: :clown: More and more funny stuff on this board...And with Peter coming back soon ....It just add to the possibility of seeing a huge jackpot won on this board.... :agree: :clown:
 

Beaker

Member
ComboM - you're good!!

ComboM, I think these results are truly amazing. :eek: :eek:

If you look at our sets here, we are on to something :agree: they are very close.

Consider this: If you took just the common ones from our 0.14/3.18 runs you would be left with:

1-5-14-24-26-28-29-34

That's 4 from 8 buddy!!! :eek: :eek: - from a system
 
WH IS GOOD NOT ME

Beaker,

Too bad we didn't play this combo 8.....But I hope it's not a flash in the pan....
Mind you WH has been very hot recently with S7 and 6/49...
Let's get that S7 first :agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
Re: WH IS GOOD NOT ME

ComboManiac said:
Beaker,

Too bad we didn't play this combo 8.....But I hope it's not a flash in the pan....
Mind you WH has been very hot recently with S7 and 6/49...
Let's get that S7 first :agree2:
I dunno about that S7 ComboM :dang: - that's a tough one :sick:
 
WH MAKES IT EASIER

Beaker,

WH is the only reason I am playing S7 otherwise I would be joining you..Remember on Febn 14 it matched 7/16 :eek:
 

daleks

Member
let me interrupt...

the super 7 is the worst to play for me too, the odds are so high, i have never done more than 4 numbers, very infrequently.......BUT....if one plays with only six numbers....throw in a DN.....odds 6 out of 47 are very good..........
 

winhunter

Member
Working together

With all of us working together, we will make something happen sometime this year. It just has to happen!




Andrew
 

Randal

Member
You Freak

01-05-06-07-14-24-26-28-29-34

this gem, played right, paid $600++, a few .01 more than your allowance.

Now, be a good boy and go play.

Pfft... keywords: "played right"

But I have to admit, more often than not this stat handicapping seems to work quite well.
 

Sidebar

Top