You were encouraging everybody to see Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 (on the Big News This AM thread); you appeared to take his lie-filled crockumentary as The Gospel, er, I mean, Secular Truth.
Now many pundits are claiming (after talking to American voters) that Michael Moore contributed to the trouncing that the Democrats suffered this week. The American public was turned off by Moore's blatant lies and they were thoroughly disgusted seeing Michael Moore given a prominent seat at the DNC sitting beside former President Jimmy Carter.
In effect, much of the public said that they did not want to vote in a party that so closely associated itself with the vile Michael Moore.
What is your take on this?
Now many pundits are claiming (after talking to American voters) that Michael Moore contributed to the trouncing that the Democrats suffered this week. The American public was turned off by Moore's blatant lies and they were thoroughly disgusted seeing Michael Moore given a prominent seat at the DNC sitting beside former President Jimmy Carter.
In effect, much of the public said that they did not want to vote in a party that so closely associated itself with the vile Michael Moore.
What is your take on this?