?

tomtom

Member
Well, just encountered this while searching the net:


The Truth About Gambling

By Clarence William Page

1. Lottery is one of the most senseless and speculative "investments" on Earth. It promotes the spending of real money for a highly elusive product (the win).

2. It is deceitful in that the real product delivered reportedly 14 million times to one (14,000,000:1) is FALSE HOPE.

3. It encourages the diversion of capital from reasonable investment vehicles which yield reasonable returns to a senseless investment which reportedly has been mathematically calculated to yield a significant return only once out of every 14 million times.

4. From a local economic point of view, it has a highly negative multiplier effect.

5. It promotes a harmful practice: unwise investing.

6. It uses miseducation to promise education: People are encouraged to participate in this "investment" fraud, and are then told that the money gained from such an "investment" will be used to "educate" them.

7. Lottery siphons money from the community but provides neither a comparable good nor service in return. (An honest tax could better benefit the community and would be more sound in moral, economic and psychological character. A tax called a tax is an honest tax. A tax called a chance is a fraud).

8. It promotes psychological instability by encouraging individuals to commit real, hard-earned assets to mostly unreal, highly improbable trade activities. To grant a fair return to all would kill the lottery. It lives and thrives by consuming the hard-earned resources of losers.

9. Its very life depends on the losses of many. Its best customers must be losers.

10. It robs so many to pay so few.

11. If it is a tax it is an unfair tax because it succeeds only in collecting from the gullible.

12. Its negative impact is doubled: 1. It (by siphoning funds) weakens the regular economy; and 2. It creates a wholly defective side economy.

13. It's one of the worse budgeting lessons a child could ever be taught.

14. It exploits the weak and seeks to weaken the strong.

15. It destroys soundness.


from
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=16&ext=1&groupid=38176&ck
 

blitzed

Member
Likewise people can lose vast sums of money "investing" on wallstreet...what about the countless penny stock scams? dotcom crashes?

High margin trading scenarios such as foreign exchange can be very risky as well...could lose initial investment within hours or minutes...not to mention potential of losing more than invested since they are covering your bets:eek:

There is absolutely nothing wrong with spending some surplus cash on lottery games. what is a few bucks chasing a dream? even if a lower-tier dream:rolling:

Instead of buying a bio-hazard fastfood meal, go home and make a sandwich, you have just created an instant lottery budget & will live a healthier life. Besides, juggling numbers is good puzzle work for the brain, it may keep us from getting alzheimers or dementia:rolling:

Lottery odds are clearly laid out for those who bother to read...there is nothing deceptive about it. The article sounds like the legislation coming from so-called representative politicians...oh we are doing this for your own good, because you are all a big dumb herd of stupid cattle that can't make decisions for yourselves:cow::cow::cow: insulting right?

why in the hell can't I play $4 to $10 of pocket change on the lottery online? funny how the USA says other countries are backwards, yet I'd have the freedom to play lottery online in numerous other countries. I'm going to have to defect if they keep telling me what I can and can not do:finger:

cheers!
blitzed
 

daleks

Member
have to agree with tomtom and the writer of the article on this one.....i remember living in canada in the 1950's and 1960's when all there was to play was the irish sweepstakes.....people had a better grip on their dreams and and work ethic.....seen a few kids over the years who have described the lotto programs on television, and the lottery winners, as "their hero"....when i asked why, they said it was because those people won money....kinda sad, i think...
 

tomtom

Member
daleks said:
have to agree with tomtom and the writer of the article on this one.....i remember living in canada in the 1950's and 1960's when all there was to play was the irish sweepstakes.....people had a better grip on their dreams and and work ethic.....seen a few kids over the years who have described the lotto programs on television, and the lottery winners, as "their hero"....when i asked why, they said it was because those people won money....kinda sad, i think...

Well, I just posted what I found searching the net, and in some situations could agree with it....



And, not sure but I think you were playing some good odds and inexpensive 6/36 pure bouncy balls with some good payouts at the beginning, in the times when people so believed in the happy future, and therefore as result there were not only some good odds games, but a baby boom, too...
 

tomtom

Member
daleks said:
....people had a better grip on their dreams and and work ethic......

People still have a good grip on their dreams and work ethics...Most people I've had a contact with, or I've worked with have practiced very high ethical standards while trying to make a honest living.


On the other hand, there is more than enough games that have a few JP winners monthly or yearly, and games that have no a JP rollover option yet it seems no one wins it for many months....

not sure why there is none games with bouncy balls, TV draws, inexpensive prices, none mandatory quick picks, good odds, good all prizes, and about few or even more big JP winners PER draw that would eventually share a BIG JP, with other many really winners PER draw when compared to the price for one combination, and where a rollover is just a very slight possibility while still an option....

such games do exist and are doing great, but for such games it seems it may be necessary to go online...
 

Sidebar

Top