6/49 Discussion For November 17, 2004
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
Dennis Bassboss said:Karnac don't be shy to post more stats because of that glitch...I have found some of your stats posts very interesting!
SHY....moi?
Not a chance I'm so outspoken they say I'm out smokin' 
........Seriously, thanks again to you and all involved in this little mystery....as charles2 and I surmised it is a glitch in the program...perhaps there is a patch already available....the data base has always been accurate as far as I know( no other variances), but let's face it the results are only as good as the data entry abilities of the person who originally entered the data. I know that some may feel it's a terrible problem when there's an error, but I don't let little things like that affect my picks.....if it happens,it happens. I'm only sorry that I posted information that was incorrect, since I only post information for the good of all players, and being incorrect many players are affected. 
don't let it happen again.Karnac said:SHY....moi?
gsobier said:...oh, here we go againwith another attitude problem
... ...where froggy gets off shooting his mouth off in the first place is beyond me
...
I can respond to this and say a lot about you and Pita boy, however I would prefer to keep my mouth shut as it would not do anyone any good.
I have said my piece and I'm at peace.
p.s. One thing though...it's a BLOB not a frog !!
Re: Re: Did you know??? Lotto 6/49 Repeating Triples FACTS
Nip...I never said your post was incorrect....I took the initiative to update and expand the thought....sorry if you felt slighted in any way as this was not my intention .... I only endeavoured to make available to all players the complete information....unfortunately there was a glitch in the software.
nipsirc said:
Nip...I never said your post was incorrect....I took the initiative to update and expand the thought....sorry if you felt slighted in any way as this was not my intention .... I only endeavoured to make available to all players the complete information....unfortunately there was a glitch in the software.
Karnac
I wasn't a bit slighted. In fact, I like it the way you did it. I do not have any problem with your post at all and I respect you.
It's just some people keep on putting there nose where they're not wanted and trying to insight some fued. That's what irritates me.... not to mention the second-the-motion guy behind him.....! I would have loved it if this was done in person and not hiding behind that keyboard, then we could have dealt with this much easier and quicker....
I wasn't a bit slighted. In fact, I like it the way you did it. I do not have any problem with your post at all and I respect you.
It's just some people keep on putting there nose where they're not wanted and trying to insight some fued. That's what irritates me.... not to mention the second-the-motion guy behind him.....! I would have loved it if this was done in person and not hiding behind that keyboard, then we could have dealt with this much easier and quicker....
This is what GH's people wrote back to more, it's no error according to them it's the way GH wanted it though some of her programmers what it like we see it !! =
"The Numbers 5-7-10 appear in at least one 4-number match, on 10-06-84 and 04-29-87 and may be in other higher-number sets. Per Gail's instructions the higher number matches are not de-composed into all of the smaller subgroups. The number group test drive and the HIT-WITH function produce the same results (the correct results in my opinion, but I'm not the boss of what goes into the program---just the programmer). If I can ever get the windows version done, I will make that behavior an option so everyone can smile.
Best Regards
Technical Support"
----------------------------
this is my original email to them =
"Hi i have your most upto date software Release: 3.55 05/11/04_____ Gail Howard's Smart Luck.
_
_
I have a few issues that the software reports incorrect data in it's
_
9. Companion Pairs (tm), Etc.
vrs the
X. Number Group Test Drive (tm)
_
_
For example i use this database of the canada 649, complete upto and including Dec 17 2004:
_______________ CAN0649
_CANADA NATIONAL 6/49+B
_
The 9. Companion Pairs (tm), Etc. chart shows_only 10 hits for 5-7-10
_
however it shows it as 13 [which is the correct number] in the X: group number test drive, which means the draw data is correct it's just a slight problem with her companion pairs database selection, it seems only the COMPANION TRIADS have this error, the other pairs seem ok vrs the x charts. In fact all the triads are off by 1 or 2 .
_
Is there a known bug here and if so will an update be released?
_
Thanks"
"The Numbers 5-7-10 appear in at least one 4-number match, on 10-06-84 and 04-29-87 and may be in other higher-number sets. Per Gail's instructions the higher number matches are not de-composed into all of the smaller subgroups. The number group test drive and the HIT-WITH function produce the same results (the correct results in my opinion, but I'm not the boss of what goes into the program---just the programmer). If I can ever get the windows version done, I will make that behavior an option so everyone can smile.
Best Regards
Technical Support"
----------------------------
this is my original email to them =
"Hi i have your most upto date software Release: 3.55 05/11/04_____ Gail Howard's Smart Luck.
_
_
I have a few issues that the software reports incorrect data in it's
_
9. Companion Pairs (tm), Etc.
vrs the
X. Number Group Test Drive (tm)
_
_
For example i use this database of the canada 649, complete upto and including Dec 17 2004:
_______________ CAN0649
_CANADA NATIONAL 6/49+B
_
The 9. Companion Pairs (tm), Etc. chart shows_only 10 hits for 5-7-10
_
however it shows it as 13 [which is the correct number] in the X: group number test drive, which means the draw data is correct it's just a slight problem with her companion pairs database selection, it seems only the COMPANION TRIADS have this error, the other pairs seem ok vrs the x charts. In fact all the triads are off by 1 or 2 .
_
Is there a known bug here and if so will an update be released?
_
Thanks"
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I somehow feel sorry for talking about these triples...I do assure everyone here that I didn't have any bad intentions by posting these...Sorry...
Dennis Bassboss said:I somehow feel sorry for talking about these triples...I do assure everyone here that I didn't have any bad intentions by posting these...Sorry...
what bad intentions, it was a good call, even though GH makes it like that i'd prefer to actually see the total result of that triple, not 10 + 3 others stuck higher up in the quads & quints but not included in that triple !. Then i have to dig at other charts like the hits with and test drive charts !.
Keep catching errors Dennis !!!! good eyes
come a little closer