6/49 Discussion For November 12, 2003

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
02 04 05 06 08 10
11 12 13 14 16 17
18 23 25 26 27 29
30 31 32 33 34 37
38 40 43 46 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(3 were here, in the last draw)
01 03 07 09 15 19
20 21 22 24 28 35
36 39 41 42 44 45
47


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 335
3 and 3: 266
5 and 1: 234
2 and 4: 090
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

Godload

Member
Just looking at the hit sequence chart 38 is looking good.

49 is a good candidate to repeat.
The million dollar question is will 43 4peat and defy the odds.
 

Sheba

Member
Godload said:
Just looking at the hit sequence chart 38 is looking good.

49 is a good candidate to repeat.
The million dollar question is will 43 4peat and defy the odds.
The 43 may show up again when we don't expect i! ....

SHeba..:dog:..
 

peter

Member
If we look at the Delta spread of the first 3 numbers in last nights draw, they were,2,21,5. the last time this happened was in draw 766, notice this is also a draw that ends in 6. exactly 1300 draws ago. Got to study 767.:agree:
 

Maggie

Member
Peter,

if you were looking at deltas, would yu normally include the bonus number in there too?
 

peter

Member
Maggie said:
Peter,

if you were looking at deltas, would yu normally include the bonus number in there too?
No not for Delta's or the width of line (spread). these are the only two files, In which I do not include the bonus.
 

Florie

Member
I have a feeling 47 more likely to repeat than 43.

1 and 20 seems to be in the running but 20 is giving more "vibrations". Could be in my final list.

Lots of cold/due numbers popping up like 12, 24, 36 and 45.
 
43 would not defy the odds... a 4-peat is overdue... just ask Beaker!

0 finals are looking better and better, especially the 20 or 40!

The clumping of numbers should continue... we have had an over-abundance of draws that were widely spread out... this should even out by clumping!

Repeaters have certainly had their flurry! Now, no repeaters are coming back around... maybe after this quad 43! If 43 does not quad, then we will not see another opportunity for a while.

We could also see three pairs of finals soon in one draw!
 

peter

Member
The Weatherman said:

We could also see three pairs of finals soon in one draw!
The last time we saw this was in draw 2062, LD pairs of 3,6,9.
I call this "DDD" .Does'nt happen often.
 

peter

Member
George , I'm feverishly working on "POSITIONAL PAIR " announcers, IE. Pos 1&2, 1&3, 1&4,....... to 5&6, etc. When I have it complete you will see the file so you can code some" home work".
 
Peter,

3 pairs of Finals happens approx. 4.6% of the time.. or almost five times in 100 draws. I have only recently began charting these patterns after a long break from studying the 6/49, so I only have stats on this for the last 59 draws, and you are right... we recently had one. It was over-due, and still is... but you are correct... it is not majorly over-due, but nonetheless, it is worth considering.
 

Beaker

Member
gsobier said:
Maggie:

Yes, it did:lol:... ...tricky 43, where was 20:confused:? Looks like Beaker is going to chase the 43 for a 4peat... ...he's got guts! Like he says, risk = reward:agree:.

Oh, I know, 02 = 20. Reminds me of one of Beaker's Laws 13/31.

Regards,
George:)
There is ZERO doubt with this one - doubtless - without doubt absolute DN number 43

:dance1:

That little gem is one of the top 3peaters BUT has never 4peated ..... 'til draw 2067 ;)

Play it to win :agree:
 
Last edited:

Beaker

Member
Maggie said:
I can't believe you are playing that 43, Beak. :p:
:lol: :lol: can you imagine :eek: I can barely believe it crossed my mind ;)

Trust me Maggie - play it - you will thank me later :agree2:

I'm going to find the biggest friggin DN wheel i can :agree:
 
Last edited:
Top