6/49 Discussion For June 7

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 02 04 05 07 08
09 10 12 14 17 21
24 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 35 37 38 40
43 44 46 47 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(3 were here, in the last draw)
03 06 11 13 15 16
18 19 20 22 23 25
33 34 36 39 41 42
45


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 336
3 and 3: 262
5 and 1: 237
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 052
1 and 5: 023
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

gsobier

Member
Finger Printing

Beaker:

This should be right up your alley... ...2016 and 2021 almost have the same finger print (Bonus Number is different) and LD pattern. The first number is also flagged (more than 9). Do you think another one looking like 2017 is on the way?

Regards,
George:)
 
Last edited:

Beaker

Member
Re: Finger Printing

gsobier said:
Beaker:

This should be right up your alley... ...2016 and 2021 almost have the same finger print (Bonus Number is different) and LD pattern. The first number is also flagged (more than 9). Do you think another one looking like 2017 is on the way?

Regards,
George:)
Could be, but I like the look of 1831-1833 better. Sorry to sound like a broken record here but that 2-decade miss is very much on the radar. As I said in the last discussion, we are going to see some very interesting draws in the next few - something :hair: is going to happen. :eek:

On another note, congratulations to all the winners for the last one. :agree2: I don't think I have seen so many 3+ hitters here ever. So many good snipers too :eek:

How'd ya like that 47 call George? Straight from the stats :eek: :clown:

Let's see if we can dig up some other gems for the next one. :agree:
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Re: Finger Printing

Beaker:

You read my mind... ...hope to find some more gems for the next one. I'll look at 1831-1833 too. Like I was saying, you, Dennis and Peter are great help:agree:! That 47 was unreal:agree2:, very nice call!... ...Dennis chose to use 45. I guess you guys try to cover as much as possible. I haven't gone to check and realize if you guys pick the same DN or not.

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
Could be, but I like the look of 1831-1833 better. Sorry to sound like a broken record here but that 2-decade miss is very much on the radar. As I said in the last discussion, we are going to see some very interesting draws in the next few - something :hair: is going to happen. :eek:

On another note, congratulations to all the winners for the last one. :agree2: I don't think I have seen so many 3+ hitters here ever. So many good snipers too :eek:

How'd ya like that 47 call George? Straight from the stats :eek: :clown:

Let's see if we can dig up some other gems for the next one. :agree:
 

Beaker

Member
20-43?

gsobier said:
Beaker:

You read my mind... ...hope to find some more gems for the next one. I'll look at 1831-1833 too. Like I was saying, you, Dennis and Peter are great help:agree:! That 47 was unrea:agree2:, very nice calll... ...Dennis chose to use 45. I guess you guys try to cover as much as possible. I haven't gone to check and realize if you guys pick the same DN or not.

Regards,
George:)
Not Dennis with the 45, the Beak! :lol: I'm pretty satisfied with what I played based on what I had predicted - high sum 170-190, 4-5 ODD, 2-decades missing - not bad. Shoulda made that 47 DN like I said instead of 45 :rolleyes: :burnt:

Not sure yet, have to :read: more but that 20-43 could be setting up nicely for this one.

More to do :agree:
 

gsobier

Member
Re: 20-43?

Beaker:

Oops, it was one of you two... ...I had 47.

We now have an open pair of 18-19 right?

Regards,
George:)
Beaker said:
Not Dennis with the 45, the Beak! :lol: I'm pretty satisfied with what I played based on what I had predicted - high sum 170-190, 4-5 ODD, 2-decades missing - not bad. Shoulda made that 47 DN like I said instead of 45 :rolleyes: :burnt:

Not sure yet, have to :read: more but that 20-43 could be setting up nicely for this one.

More to do :agree:
 

Beaker

Member
Re: Re: 20-43?

gsobier said:
Beaker:

Oops, it was one of you two... ...I had 47.

We now have an open pair of 18-19 right?

Regards,
George:)
18-19
22-23
31-32

Got to consider something from these for sure :agree:
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Re: Re: 20-43?

..and a repeater from outside those too I'd say:agree:...

I just noticed I'm a Super Senior Member now, huh???
Beaker said:
18-19
22-23
31-32

Got to consider something from these for sure :agree:
 

peter

Member
Re: Re: Re: Re: 20-43?

gsobier said:
..I just noticed I'm a Super Senior Member now, huh???
That's what you become when you start to BS alot.:lol:
Congrats on the new status, now we expect more from you!:lol:
 

peter

Member
Hey guys and gals, sorry, but I've been real busy last couple of days, I have'nt had a chance to view everyones results, but I would like to offer my congratulations to everyone for thier most excellent performance.:agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
peter said:
Hey guys and gals, sorry, but I've been real busy last couple of days, I have'nt had a chance to view everyones results, but I would like to offer my congratulations to everyone for thier most excellent performance.:agree2:
What gets me is two things really stood out for me - that 47 from the double announcer lists and that LD 3 trend - both compliments of Dennis Bassboss :agree:

Hey Peter, when you get a chance post your great positional table - I miss that one :agree:
 

colonel4

Member
Looked at best bet numbers for May 21. Since then those numbers have hit the last 4 draws
June 4 - 3 numbers
May 31- 3 numbers
May 28- 4 numbers
May 24- 3 numbers

Just may be of help to someone
 

peter

Member
colonel4 said:
Looked at best bet numbers for May 21. Since then those numbers have hit the last 4 draws
June 4 - 3 numbers
May 31- 3 numbers
May 28- 4 numbers
May 24- 3 numbers

Just may be of help to someone
Excellent that you should Bring that up Colonel4, thats exactly why it was decided to have "BestBet" as a regular feature thread.:agree2:
 

peter

Member
Beaker said:

Hey Peter, when you get a chance post your great positional table - I miss that one :agree:
Beaker, my friend, just for you I will resurrect it, don't have time right at the moment, but watch for it in this thread, glad you enjoyed buddy!:agree2:
 

peter

Member
I would'nt be surprised, if we see a triple repeat this draw.
Yes , you heard correctly,..... A TRIPLE REPEAT!!!!!!!!!18,43,47.
 

peter

Member
Number position : where the numbers sit, after last nights draw.
First off, all 49 numbers are open from 17 draws, dating back to draw 1999.
Pos 1,= 2,1,4,5,11,3,6,14,18, = 9 numbers
Pos 2,=13,17,7,12,16,19,= 6 numbers
Pos 3,=21,28,37,15,20,22,29,= 7 numbers
Pos 4,=36,30,35,26,25,23,33, =7 numbers
Pos 5,=34,24,44,41,38,31,40, = 7 numbers
Pos 6,=42,48,45,47, = 4 numbers
Pos 7,=27,49,9,8,10,46,39,32,43, = 9 numbers.
Looking at the above chart, I would play 2 numbers from Positions 1 and 7, and not play ANY from Position 6.:read:
The two draws that I see Not closing out are Draws 2007 with the 21, and draw 2010 with the 30, also do not see draws 1999,2003,and 2004 respectively closing out with the 2,1,& 36.So in essence, I've elimanated the 21,30,1,2,36,42,48,45,47. from play, now if I can find another decade to elimanate, I'll have a smaller number base from which to select, and that should appeal to George,P.S. The numbers in each position are from oldest to most recent.
 
Last edited:

peter

Member
My overall numbers chart says that we are currently in a repeat and consecutives trend, I expect to see both in the next draw.
 

peter

Member
Last nights, DD LD of 3 & 9 came 25 times previous. draws,
24,118,263,469,499,524,669,703,743,801,814,881,969,1082,1174,1299,1352,1388,1422,1656,1701,1733,1743,1779,1844.
 
Top