6/49 Discussion For July 30, 2003

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 02 03 05 07 09
12 14 15 16 17 18
19 21 22 23 24 25
29 30 31 33 37 41
43 44 46 47 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(4 were here, in the last draw) :eek:
04 06 08 10 11 13
20 26 27 28 32 34
35 36 38 39 40 42
45


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 337
3 and 3: 263
5 and 1: 238
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

Maggie

Member
Another question

Since everyone has the same draw history for 6/49, and WH goes back 300 draws, does that mean you all get the exact same stacks when you run it? Or does it depend on which criteria you use?
 

Beaker

Member
Re: Another question

Maggie said:
Since everyone has the same draw history for 6/49, and WH goes back 300 draws, does that mean you all get the exact same stacks when you run it? Or does it depend on which criteria you use?
Maggie, just for clarification, the draw history I used was 300 draws. You can use any number of draws to test, and within WinHunter you can optimize the number of draws to use. 300 is arbitrary on my part.

If someone had the exact stack and history as me, yes the predictions would be the same. But, two people discovering precisely the same stack is possible but not probable. :no: I'm guessing but the number of possible stack configurations is a very very BIG number - maybe 100's of billions or more. :notme: IT's alot :eek:

WinHunter likes the 37 to hit for this one. ;)
 

Maggie

Member
Oh, now I see, said the blind man..I thought for some reason everyone used the last 300 draws as history. Makes sense now. :cool:
 
Re: Another question

Maggie said:
Since everyone has the same draw history for 6/49, and WH goes back 300 draws, does that mean you all get the exact same stacks when you run it? Or does it depend on which criteria you use?
Maggie some stacks might look like others but like you mentionned the settings criterias are enormous..and the slitest change in one of these can change the results in a drastic fashion...There are many processors and the way each of them is set up will have an effect on the overall results we might get...
I created another dazzling one this morning...reached sky high for 6/49 DN tracker...close very... close to 50% with only 2 numbers(one of them hitting)....It had a streak of 22 draws in a row without missing target ....And Beaker that red Bus processor is hiding some goods let me tell you when joined with other stuff...
:agree:
 

Beaker

Member
I ran that RedBus processor before - didn't look too promising. But I think there was a bug with that one that Andrew fixed so it may be better now :agree2:

I'll check some of my old runs :agree:
 

Maggie

Member
Dennis, are you using WH for 6/49 right now or doing like Beaker and running tests on it for now to see how it delivers?

I like the 29-37 you guys mentioned. Didn't play them, but thought of them, as well as 20-45-48. Maybe I'll just do a line of those. :p:
 
Maggie said:
Dennis, are you using WH for 6/49 right now or doing like Beaker and running tests on it for now to see how it delivers?

I like the 29-37 you guys mentioned. Didn't play them, but thought of them, as well as 20-45-48. Maybe I'll just do a line of those. :p:
I had it for the last two draws ...but only now do I have some stacks that will delivers on a constant basis...as for the testing to see how it delivers...you see that right away Maggie with this device when you backtest it....what it did is what it will do... :agree:
 
..ONE OF THESE TWO WILL BE MY DN'S.....

..23..24..

..43..44..

I'VE BEEN WAY TO BUSY...DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TYME TO PLAY THE LAST COUPLE OF DRAWS...:bawl: :bawl:

CONGRATS TO THE WINNERS IN THE PAST DRAWS.... :agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
Not much discusssion for this one :eek: so I'll add my $0.02

I mentioned last time that 30 may hit for this one - it is one of the top hitters 11 draws out.

I see alot of hits for low side of the decades except for the 1's

20-21-30-41-42
 
I'll add this to these.....Beware of the open pairs in the 20s and 30s especially....
But the tag team duo of 20-22 has to pay us a visit soon....
:agree:
 

Beaker

Member
gsobier said:

No more than three from here is most likely:
(4 were here, in the last draw) :eek:
04 06 08 10 11 13
20 26 27 28 32 34
35 36 38 39 40 42
45


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 337
3 and 3: 263
5 and 1: 238
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
George, it seems that 4 hits from the 19 list is not that common. Do you have stats about what the next draw after 4 hits brings from the 19? or is it evenly distributed?
 
GOING WITH MAGGIE

I'M LIKE THE LOOKS OF SOME OF MAGGIE'S PICKS....THESE FOUR ARE GOING TO BE IN MY FINALS......

..23..24..40..42.. :agree2: :agree:

AND I'M STICKING WITH MY BEST BET..44 ..:goodluck:
 
This stack is overdue by now...Expect at least one from these ...But we might see 2...
DN tracker.xml
3 Predictions for the next drawing:
4-41-46
:agree:
 
Top