gsobier said:you would have to assume we would have to decide and agree on which numbers to play
What the brilliant organizers of a lottery syndicate did was to buy as many of the combinations as they could when the West Virginia lottery jackpot exceeded the odds. They made millions in profit.
97% of last night's tickets were losers, but if all the players could have pooled instead, they would have beaten the lottery and made over $1.25 million. If or when the jackpot reaches $28 million again, forum members can buy hundreds of tickets separately and at least 97% of the players would lose money. Or we could all pool together for a good chance of 100% of the members making money. For example, if the pool pot was $964, instead of buying 482 Quick Picks
, members can vote for 11 of the "best" numbers to buy a complete wheel. The odds of winning would improve to 1 in 6 by pooling together. 
... ...another thing, all those Quick Picks issued have duplicate losers... ...the criteria of what Quick Picks follow is something unknown (each region might be different)... ...same thing for players who choose numbers... ...07 and possibly 31 selected the most by players who attempt to set a trap... ...then there is the good 'ol 01-31 when everyone in the family is used to create a line... ...when decade 40 misses, they have a better chance... ...decade 00 has one less number so not playing 01-09 is a bit better...




